Original Research

Guidelines for assessing the knowledge management maturity of organizations

C. J. Kruger, M. M.M. Snyman
South African Journal of Information Management | Vol 9, No 3 | a34 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v9i3.34 | © 2007 C. J. Kruger, M. M.M. Snyman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 November 2007 | Published: 03 November 2007

About the author(s)

C. J. Kruger, University of Pretoria, South Africa
M. M.M. Snyman, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (68KB)

Abstract

In a recent article Kruger and Snyman hypothesized that progressions in knowledge management maturity (from a strategic perspective) are directly related to an increased ability to speed up the strategic cycle of imitation, consolidation and innovation. The arguments proposed, however, neglected to supply the reader with a practical toolkit or even a roadmap (a time-related matrix, or questionnaire) to successfully measure succession in knowledge management maturity. This article builds on the previous one and proposes a questionnaire consisting of six sections, containing 101 descriptive questions, to enable organizations to test and assess their knowledge management maturity empirically. The development of an instrument to measure knowledge management maturity required adhering to a research design that combined theoretical propositions with practical experimentation. As a point of departure, a knowledge management maturity matrix consisting of seven maturity levels was formulated. All questions contained within the matrix were benchmarked against a survey questionnaire developed by the public management service of the OECD (PUMA) and were also pre-tested and validated. This process of refinement led to the formulation of the Knowledge Management Maturity Questionnaire. To avoid any taint of this research being based only on theoretical propositions, the questionnaire was tested by 178 master students of the University of Pretoria, South Africa, in nine different industries. The proposed questionnaire provides a bridge between theoretical propositions and practical usability, not only enabling knowledge management practitioners to assess the level of knowledge management maturity reached successfully but, more importantly, also serving as a guideline to institutionalize further and future knowledge management endeavours.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 11073
Total article views: 14056

 

Crossref Citations

1. Knowledge Management Practices and Results in Service‐Oriented versus Product‐Oriented Companies
Aino Kianto, Tatiana Andreeva
Knowledge and Process Management  vol: 21  issue: 4  first page: 221  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1002/kpm.1443

2. Reflection of embedded knowledge culture in communications of Australian companies
Andrej Miklosik, Nina Evans, Maria Hasprova, Julia Lipianska
Knowledge Management Research & Practice  vol: 17  issue: 2  first page: 172  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/14778238.2018.1538602

3. Principles in knowledge management maturity: a South African perspective
Cornelius Johannes Kruger, Roy D. Johnson
Journal of Knowledge Management  vol: 14  issue: 4  first page: 540  year: 2010  
doi: 10.1108/13673271011059518

4. Is there a correlation between knowledge management maturity and organizational performance?
Cornelius Johannes (Neels) Kruger, Roy D. Johnson
VINE  vol: 41  issue: 3  first page: 265  year: 2011  
doi: 10.1108/03055721111171618

5. Gestión de conocimiento, ¿necesidad o valor agregado?
Fernando Andrés Muñoz Peña
Ciencia y Poder Aéreo  vol: 12  issue: 1  first page: 276  year: 2017  
doi: 10.18667/cienciaypoderaereo.578

6. Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance
Giovanni Schiuma, Tatiana Andreeva, Aino Kianto
Journal of Knowledge Management  vol: 16  issue: 4  first page: 617  year: 2012  
doi: 10.1108/13673271211246185

7. Knowledge management maturity assessment frameworks: A proposed holistic approach
Eirini Bougoulia, Michail Glykas
Knowledge and Process Management  vol: 30  issue: 4  first page: 355  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1002/kpm.1731

8. Tradução e validação de conteúdo do instrumento para avaliação da Gestão do Conhecimento holística
Fábio Corrêa, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Carvalho, Fernando Hadad Zaidan, Jurema Suely de Araújo Nery Ribeiro, Vinícius Figueiredo de Faria
Em Questão  first page: 121287  year: 2022  
doi: 10.19132/1808-5245284.121287

9. The intriguing art of knowledge management and its relation to learning organizations
Karim Moustaghfir, Silva Karkoulian, Leila Canaan Messarra, Richard McCarthy
Journal of Knowledge Management  vol: 17  issue: 4  first page: 511  year: 2013  
doi: 10.1108/JKM-03-2013-0102

10. Information management as an enabler of knowledge management maturity: A South African perspective
C.J. (Neels) Kruger, Roy D. Johnson
International Journal of Information Management  vol: 30  issue: 1  first page: 57  year: 2010  
doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.06.007

11. Assessment of knowledge management growth: a South Africa perspective
C.J. (Neels) Kruger, Roy D. Johnson
Aslib Proceedings  vol: 61  issue: 6  first page: 542  year: 2009  
doi: 10.1108/00012530911005517

12. Knowledge management according to organisational size: A South African perspective
Cornelius Kruger, Roy D. Johnson
SA Journal of Information Management  vol: 15  issue: 1  year: 2013  
doi: 10.4102/sajim.v15i1.526

13. Employee perceptions of knowledge management in two service units: A case study of management services and organisational development (OD) and skills development units
Bethuel Sibongiseni Ngcamu
Corporate Ownership and Control  vol: 8  issue: 3-4  first page: 464  year: 2011  
doi: 10.22495/cocv8i3c4p4

14. A conceptual breakdown structure for knowledge management benefits using meta-synthesis method
Shiva Yahyapour, Mehdi Shamizanjani, Mohammad Mosakhani
Journal of Knowledge Management  vol: 19  issue: 6  first page: 1295  year: 2015  
doi: 10.1108/JKM-05-2015-0166

15. Análise de modelos de maturidade de gestão do conhecimento
Fabio Corrêa, Vinícius Figueiredo de Faria, Fabrício Ziviani, Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Carvalho, Jurema Suely de Araújo Nery Ribeiro
Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento  vol: 15  issue: 1  first page: 2  year: 2025  
doi: 10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2025v15n1.69348