Original Research

Privacy Paradox in Industry 4.0: A review of library information services and data protection

Yumnaa Ocks, Oghenere G. Salubi
South African Journal of Information Management | Vol 26, No 1 | a1845 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1845 | © 2024 Yumnaa Ocks, Oghenere G. Salubi | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 25 February 2024 | Published: 29 August 2024

About the author(s)

Yumnaa Ocks, Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Arts, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
Oghenere G. Salubi, Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Arts, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Background: In the wake of Industry 4.0, libraries are integrating Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies to enhance efficiency. However, this shift in practice raises ethical and privacy concerns, particularly regarding the Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPI Act).

Objectives: This literature review explores the ethical and privacy challenges posed by 4IR technologies in delivering information services to library patrons including the impact on PoPI Act compliance in addressing data privacy concerns.

Method: Adopting a systematic approach, this literature review employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart and inclusion criteria focussed on 4IR in libraries and its relation to the PoPI Act. Peer-reviewed articles in English from 2013 to 2023 were sourced from scholarly databases.

Results: The review highlights the transformation of academic library services in the 4IR era and the consequent privacy challenges. Concerns arise from advanced library systems and extensive data retention. While libraries operate non-profitably, the adoption of 4IR technologies for data acquisition mirrors commercial practices, raising ethical questions. Patron privacy issues extend beyond traditional data collection to potential misuse and improper data handling as libraries often work with vendors.

Conclusion: The integration of 4IR technologies in academic libraries necessitates a delicate balance between improved services and safeguarding user privacy and the PoPI Act serves as a crucial regulatory framework. Librarians must navigate the evolving landscape of data ethics, emphasising transparency, accountability and adherence to privacy legislation.

Contribution: The introduction of artificial intelligence and 4IR technologies to library information services has unlimited possibilities including countering misinformation and disinformation, and the expansion of library services to tech-savvy users beyond the physical walls of the library building. However, the deployment of these technologies raises new questions about ethical concerns that the use of these technologies poses to information professionals in the rendition of library services. The results of this study will be useful for policy and professional practice in taking full advantage of 4IR technologies and services.


Keywords

Industry 4.0; F-TechEthix; privacy; academic libraries; information ethics; PoPI Act

JEL Codes

I10: General; O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 461
Total article views: 332


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.