<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SAJIM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>South African Journal of Information Management</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2078-1865</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1560-683X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>AOSIS</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SAJIM-19-744</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/sajim.v19i1.744</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Factors explaining user loyalty in a social media-based brand community</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Potgieter</surname>
<given-names>Louis M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Naidoo</surname>
<given-names>Rennie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="AF0001"><label>1</label>Department of Informatics, School of Information Technology, University of Pretoria, South Africa</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><bold>Corresponding author:</bold> Rennie Naidoo, <email xlink:href="rennie.naidoo@up.ac.za">rennie.naidoo@up.ac.za</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<elocation-id>744</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>08</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2017. The Authors</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
<license-p>AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Marketers are interested in taking advantage of the capabilities of social media-based brand communities to develop long-term relationships with their customers. This research investigated the usage of a South African Facebook page to understand user attitudes and attendant pressures on users related to social norms and user loyalty.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st2">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>The research investigated the extent to which perceived value, service quality and social factors influenced the customer&#x2019;s intention to continue using a global motor vehicle firm&#x2019;s social media-based online brand community (OBC).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st3">
<title>Method</title>
<p>We used an online voluntary survey to collect data from social media-based brand community members. In total, 303 responses were collected over a period of 4 weeks from a population of 3100 members. We analysed the relationship between trust, perceived responsiveness, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social norms and the members&#x2019; intention to continue using the firm&#x2019;s OBC. 293 usable observations were subjected to descriptive, correlation and regression analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st4">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The age of the respondents varied from 18 to 58 years with a mean age of 32 years. Of these, 60&#x0025; were men and 40&#x0025; women. About 86.7&#x0025; of the respondents reported having at least some form of tertiary education. The results of the multiple regression analysis indicate that service quality factors such as trust (25.5&#x0025;) and social influence factors such as social norms (12.5&#x0025;) explain a greater part of the variance in OBC continuance intention compared with utility factors such as perceived usefulness (18.2&#x0025;). The effects for responsiveness and ease of use were not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Social media-based brand communities are playing an important role in enhancing the overall trust relationship, value offering, sociality, knowledge and information sharing between customers and firms. Practitioners should note that the loyalty of customers using a firm&#x2019;s social media-based brand community is still associated with customers&#x2019; historical trust in the branded goods or services, and real-world relationships with the firm and brand community members.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s0001">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The popularity of social media platforms provides firms with the opportunity to build social media-based brand communities (McAlexander, Schouten &#x0026; Koenig <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">2010</xref>). Brand communities provide the firm with access to relationships with customers who admire their brand (Muniz &#x0026; O&#x2019;Guinn <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0040">2001</xref>). Traditional brand communities such as &#x2018;brand fests&#x2019; can be beneficial because firms are able to learn about customer perceptions of new product offerings and the possible outcomes of competitive tactics, attract and collaborate closely with loyal customers, influence customer evaluations and actions, disseminate knowledge and establish a &#x2018;holy grail&#x2019; of loyal customers (Laroche, Habibi &#x0026; Richard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0033">2013</xref>; McAlexander et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">2010</xref>). In addition, recent innovations in social media-based brand communities provide firms with benefits such as wider customer reach, lower costs and greater communication efficacy (Laroche et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0034">2012</xref>). However, although there have been a number of studies on offline brand communities, only a few studies have investigated social media-based online brand communities (OBCs).</p>
<p>Social network sites (SNSs) allow people to self-present, to form social networks and to establish and maintain social relationships (Cheung, Chiu &#x0026; Lee <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2011</xref>). For example, Facebook.com was originally meant to connect college students. Now it enables the general masses to connect with virtual groups that share common interests (Ellison, Steinfield &#x0026; Lampe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2007</xref>). As of the last quarter of 2015, Facebook &#x2013; now the world&#x2019;s leading online social network service (SNS) &#x2013; had over 1.5 billion monthly active users (Statista <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0049">2015</xref>). In South Africa, over the same period, Facebook had as many as 12 million monthly active users. Facebook members can now also join virtual groups such as online brand communities (OBCs) (Marchi, Giachetti &#x0026; De Gennaro <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0037">2011</xref>). Despite the critical mass of users on Facebook, user loyalty is a key problem plaguing leading online SNS firms such as MySpace and Friendster (Nielsen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0042">2009</xref>). Non-SNS firms are also struggling to retain a critical mass of their customers to build sustainable OBCs (Ku, Chen &#x0026; Zhang <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2013</xref>). From a practical standpoint, the benefit of user loyalty is appealing to firms who have social media-based OBCs (Hoffman &#x0026; Fodor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0028">2010</xref>; Kietzmann et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0031">2011</xref>). Because the long-term viability of OBCs depend on their continued use (Wang &#x0026; Datta <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0057">2006</xref>; Wang, Xu &#x0026; Chan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0055">2008</xref>), it is critical that firms understand the factors that drive continuance and loyalty (Viljoen, Dube &#x0026; Murisi <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0054">2016</xref>). Also referred to as OBC revisit, continuance encapsulates the user&#x2019;s actual or behavioural intention to continue regular use of a social media-based OBC (Bhattacherjee <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2001a</xref>).</p>
<p>The theory of reasoned action (TRA) has been successfully used to predict brand loyalty intention from attitudes and subjective norms (Ha <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">1998</xref>), and thus, it is used as the theory base for this study. This research extends concepts in TRA by developing a research model to study psychological factors that influence users&#x2019; continuance (loyalty) intention in the context of an OBC. We propose a model in which attitude toward use consists of perceived value (utility) factors including perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, as well as service quality factors including trust and perceived responsiveness, and subjective norms that include social and interpersonal influence. Using survey data from a single OBC site, we employed regression modelling to assess the model and to test the research hypotheses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0002">
<title>Literature review</title>
<sec id="s20003">
<title>Online brand community loyalty</title>
<p>The brand community concept is not a novel one. Boorstin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0009">1974</xref>:89) used the term &#x2018;marketplace communities&#x2019; to describe consumption communities that shape and maintain what people consume. Muniz and O&#x2019;Guinn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0040">2001</xref>:412) described a brand community as &#x2018;a specialized, non-geographically bound community, based on a structured set of social relationships among users of a brand&#x2019;. McAlexander et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">2010</xref>) provided a more customer-centric perspective of the brand community. They suggest that brand communities exist and are meaningful to customers because of the overall experience they provide rather than because of the brand experience itself. Because marketers are interested in taking advantage of the capabilities of social media-based brand communities to develop long-term relationships with their customers, the main objective of this study is to examine what firms can do to persuade their customers to repeatedly engage with them. There is growing interest among firms to understand the factors that motivate OBC loyalty, that is, factors that lead customers to continue or discontinue using OBCs (Bhattacherjee <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2001a</xref>). Continuance provides the critical mass of customers needed by the firm to take advantage of the benefits of OBCs. The theoretical support for emphasising continuance comes from relationship marketing theory. This theory emphasises the need to retain existing customers (Gr&#x00F6;nroos <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0024">1996</xref>). Relationship marketing theory argues that it is largely in keeping promises that firms develop and maintain long-term relationships. On the contrary, failure to keep promises may lead to defection or discontinuance. Therefore, relationship marketing theory provides significant support for the continuance concept as a key consequent variable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20004">
<title>Perceived value</title>
<p>Zeithmal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0058">1988</xref>:14) defined perceived value as &#x2018;the consumer&#x2019;s overall assessment of the utility of a product (service) based on a perception of what is received and what is given&#x2019;. In another words, perceived value represents the difference between perceived benefits and costs. There is a strong support in the marketing literature that future patronage intentions are determined by perceived value (Caruana et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2000</xref>). Despite the fact that value plays a significant role in determining customers&#x2019; choices and their decisions to continue or end a relationship (Ravald &#x0026; Gr&#x00F6;nroos <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0047">1996</xref>), up to now this concept has received less attention by scholars studying how users use OBCs (Kettinger &#x0026; Hu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0030">2008</xref>; Ku et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2013</xref>). The marketing concept of perceived value is similar to the information systems (IS) concept of perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness is an instrumental and outcome consideration that has been well established in the management information systems (MIS) literature. The technology acceptance model (TAM) by Davis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">1989</xref>) defines perceived usefulness as the extent to which a user believes that using an IS will enhance their job performance. Other TAM researchers have also supported the view that users will tend to use or not use an IS to the extent they believe it will help them perform their tasks better (Venkatesh, Thong &#x0026; Xu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). Although the study of perceived usefulness was initially limited to job-related contexts, attributes of perceived usefulness, such as saving time and effort, and providing convenience, have also been applied to the broader online context (Lin &#x0026; Lu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2011</xref>; Moon &#x0026; Kim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">2001</xref>). Thus, perceived usefulness can be regarded as a measure of the consumer&#x2019;s own perceived costs and benefits of using a technology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20005">
<title>Service quality</title>
<p>Poor service experience is generally a key reason why many customers defect (Rigby, Reichheld &#x0026; Schefter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0048">2002</xref>; Zeithaml, Berry &#x0026; Parasuraman <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0060">1996</xref>). One of the earliest definitions of service quality alludes to the difference between what customers expect and what they perceive to be receiving from the firm (Parasuraman, Zeithaml &#x0026; Berry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">1988</xref>). For nearly three decades, both traditional service and IS disciplines have used Parasuraman et al.&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">1988</xref>) multiple-item service quality (SERVQUAL) scale for measuring the user&#x2019;s assessment of service quality (Pitt, Watson &#x0026; Kavan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">1995</xref>). The five SERVQUAL dimensions, namely, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangibles, were developed from interpersonal encounters (Parasuraman et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">1988</xref>). Some researchers argue that these dimensions may not always be appropriate for information intensive electronic services (Zeithaml <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0059">2002</xref>). The IS literature argues that information processing should be the focal point for information intensive electronic services (Pitt et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">1995</xref>). In particular, literature studying social media emphasises related issues such as privacy, security, information sharing (Fogel &#x0026; Nehmad <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">2009</xref>; Ku et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2013</xref>) and responsive service support (Adjei, Noble &#x0026; Noble <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0001">2010</xref>) among users of social networking platforms. It appears that trust and responsiveness, on the part of consumers, could illuminate much more about OBC continuance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20006">
<title>Social influence</title>
<p>Social influence refers to change in a consumer&#x2019;s thoughts, feelings, attitudes or behaviours that arise from interacting with another consumer or group of consumers who share similar norms, values and interests (Burnkrant &#x0026; Cousineau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0010">1975</xref>; Cialdini &#x0026; Trost <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">1998</xref>). Major theoretical models, such as the TAM2 (Venkatesh &#x0026; Davis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0051">2000</xref>) and the Unified theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (Venkatesh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0052">2003</xref>), have attempted to account for the role of social influence in technology adoption. Despite theoretical support (Bagozzi &#x0026; Lee <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2002</xref>), empirical findings on the effects of social influence have been inconsistent. Although some recent studies found that social influence has significant effects on an individual&#x2019;s perceived usefulness and behavioural intention to adopt a technology (Wang &#x0026; Chou <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0056">2014</xref>), other studies have been inconclusive (Tsai &#x0026; Bagozzi <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0050">2014</xref>). However, researchers have generally studied social influence in compliance-based use contexts (Chan et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0014">2010</xref>). Therefore, more research needs to account for the role of social influence in socially enriched voluntary use environments (Naidoo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">2014</xref>), such as OBCs. Social connectedness and the consumer&#x2019;s needs for belongingness are important for a consumer&#x2019;s psychological sense of community. Social media-based brand communities, in particular, rely on the active participation and interaction of consumers. For example, marketers found that verbal and face-to-face word of mouth (WOM) can be complemented with e-WOM via online OBCs (Gupta &#x0026; Harris <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0025">2010</xref>). The importance of customer experience on OBCs calls for a broader understanding of social relations (Algesheimer, Dholakia &#x0026; Herrmann <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2005</xref>; Carlson, Suter &#x0026; Brown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2008</xref>; Ellison et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2007</xref>). However, the subsequent inclusion of social pressure and other cultural factors in technology use studies has yielded limited insights (Venkatesh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). Subjective or social norms refer to consumers&#x2019; perception that most people who are important to them think they should or should not perform the behaviour in question (Ajzen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">1991</xref>). It refers to the perceived social pressure felt by individuals to perform or not to perform the behaviour. Social norms appears to be an important determinant of intention in the OBC context (Algesheimer et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2005</xref>; Carlson et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2008</xref>). Customers may choose to continue using an OBC if they believe that important social referents think they should perform the behaviour, and they are sufficiently motivated to comply with their social referents&#x2019; behaviour (Venkatesh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). The use of OBCs often implies conforming to social norms (Laroche et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0034">2012</xref>). Further, because of the intimacy shared among members of a brand community, the social pressure to use the OBC can be particularly high. It is possible that customers might comply with a given behaviour because of their inclination to meet the expectations and pressures exerted by influential social referents (Ha <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">1998</xref>). Therefore, this study expects that social norms will influence the loyal use of OBCs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0007">
<title>Research model and hypotheses</title>
<sec id="s20008">
<title>The theory of reasoned action</title>
<p>This research aims to identify the most important cognitive beliefs that predict and explain customer loyalty toward a social media-based OBC. The research model in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F0001">Figure 1</xref> draws upon Ajzen&#x2019;s TRA from the social psychology literature, where it has been used to study a wide range of individual behaviours (Fishbein &#x0026; Ajzen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0020">1975</xref>). TRA asserts that a person&#x2019;s behaviour is a conscious reasoned choice influenced by their cognitive thinking and social pressures. The theory postulates that behaviours result from the intention to adopt that behaviour. TRA views intention as a function of the person&#x2019;s attitude and subjective norm toward that behaviour (Ha <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">1998</xref>). It defines attitude as a person&#x2019;s overall positive or negative evaluation about performing the behaviour in question and subjective norm as a person&#x2019;s perception of whether people important to that person expect the person to perform the intended behaviour (Ajzen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">1991</xref>). These norms come from different referent groups such as friends, family or colleagues at work. Similar to the TRA, which uses intention toward a behaviour as a predictor of the actual behaviour, this study assumes that continuance intention is the best predictor of online loyalty. Therefore, we use continuance intention as a surrogate for OBC loyalty. Bhattacherjee (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2001b</xref>:352) described continuance as &#x2018;the existence of a post-acceptance stage when ISs use transcends conscious behavior and becomes part of normal routine activity&#x2019;. Therefore, this study&#x2019;s model uses continuance intention as the dependent variable (DV).</p>
<fig id="F0001">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Proposed online brand community loyalty model based on the theory of reasoned action.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-19-744-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s20009">
<title>Hypotheses</title>
<p>The two prominent factors of the TAM that will be used in this research study are perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use (Davis et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">1989</xref>; Venkatesh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). Many researchers have found that if an individual perceives that a certain technology will aid in performing tasks better, their attitude toward that technology use will be positive (Moon &#x0026; Kim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">2001</xref>; Ramayah &#x0026; Ignatius <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0046">2005</xref>; Venkatesh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). Some scholars have discovered that users&#x2019; perceived usefulness also affects positive intention to use social media (Akar &#x0026; Mardikyan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2014</xref>; Lin &#x0026; Lu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2011</xref>). Using an OBC enables a user to acquire more information about the brand, know more about the people in the brand community, improve user efficiency in sharing knowledge and information and connecting with others, and offers a useful way to interact between brand community members (Akar &#x0026; Mardikyan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2014</xref>). To test if perceived usefulness is a determining factor in relation to social media-based brand communities, the first hypothesis states:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><bold>H1:</bold> There is a positive association between users&#x2019; beliefs about the usefulness of a social media-based online brand community and their continuance intention.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Perceived ease of use is described as the degree to which a person believes that using a particular technology would be free from effort (Davis et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">1989</xref>). During the process of accepting the technology, users assess how easy it is to learn how to use the IS in question. Perceived ease of use is likely to increase technology use (Moon &#x0026; Kim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">2001</xref>). Although current literature finds that perceived ease of use is important in the use of social networking sites (Akar &#x0026; Mardikyan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2014</xref>; Lin &#x0026; Lu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2011</xref>), this study seeks to investigate its specific impact on social media-based OBCs. This leads to the second hypothesis:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><bold>H2:</bold> There is a positive association between users&#x2019; beliefs about the ease of use of a social media-based online brand community and their continuance intention.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Firms that are able to convey trust appear to provide greater levels of service quality (Zeithaml et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0060">1996</xref>) and repeat patronage (Rigby et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0048">2002</xref>) than their competitors. Trust plays an important role in all forms of commercial exchanges and is more important in exchanges where one party must exhibit complete faith in another or expose themselves to uncertainty or risk (Gefen, Karahanna &#x0026; Straub <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2003</xref>; Gefen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">2000</xref>). In the social networking environment, users are often concerned about security, privacy and fraud issues (Dwyer, Hiltz &#x0026; Passerini <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2007</xref>; Laroche et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0033">2013</xref>; Nyoni &#x0026; Velempini <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">2015</xref>). This is further exacerbated by the uncertainty of using the somewhat open Internet infrastructure to interact (Gefen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">2000</xref>). When compared to traditional services, OBCs are faced with a greater set of challenges to develop trust. Therefore, this research posits that users evaluate the trust they have about the OBC before they form an intention to continue visiting. It follows that:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><bold>H3:</bold> There is a positive association between users&#x2019; beliefs about the trust of a social media-based online brand community and their continuance intention.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Responsiveness is defined as the willingness to help customers and provide a prompt service (Parasuraman et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">1988</xref>; Zeithaml <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0059">2002</xref>). Many researchers have commented on the importance of responsiveness in traditional service firms and other disciplines (Pitt et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">1995</xref>). Previous empirical research also confirms that prompt service is positively associated with purchase intentions, customer preferences and recommendations (Zeithaml <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0059">2002</xref>). For OBCs, responsiveness also includes post-site service aspects such as issue resolution (Kietzmann et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0031">2011</xref>; Ramayah &#x0026; Ignatius <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0046">2005</xref>). Responsiveness can be viewed as the firm&#x2019;s ability to respond quickly to the user&#x2019;s requests for support (Bertot, Jaeger &#x0026; Grimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">2010</xref>) or inquiries on service failures (Mangold &#x0026; Faulds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0036">2009</xref>). It is conceivable that an OBC that offers acceptable online responsiveness creates positive user continuance intentions. Therefore, it follows that:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><bold>H4:</bold> There is a positive association between users&#x2019; beliefs about the responsiveness of a social media-based online brand community and their continuance intention.</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Subjective norm is the process where users incorporate a referent&#x2019;s belief into their belief structure (Venkatesh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). This implies if the user&#x2019;s peers believe the system should be used, the user will also tend to believe the system should be used (Ramayah &#x0026; Ignatius <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0046">2005</xref>). For instance, users are concerned about their image, that is, the degree to which the use of the system enhances their status in their social group (Hsu &#x0026; Chiu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0029">2004</xref>). If the user&#x2019;s peers believe that the user should use the social networking site, the user will accept this system to improve his or her image (Ku et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2013</xref>; Lin &#x0026; Lu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2011</xref>). In keeping with advances in SNS-based studies, this research study proposes the inclusion of social norms in OBC use. This leads to the fifth and final hypothesis:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p><bold>H5:</bold> There is a positive association between users&#x2019; beliefs about the social norms of a social media-based online brand community and their continuance intention.</p>
</disp-quote>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0010">
<title>Research methodology</title>
<p>The target population of this study was users of a global motor vehicle manufacturing &#x2018;Facebook friends&#x2019; page in South Africa. We complied with the ethics policies of our institution. For instance, we obtained written ethical approval from the collaborating organisation involved in the research. All the participants also acknowledged that they understood the nature and purpose of the research and that they freely consented to participating in the study. Empirical data for hypothesis testing were collected using a self-administered online survey questionnaire. The questionnaire was pre-tested for content and face validity by four ISs researchers and four marketing practitioners. Only a few minor suggestions were made concerning the wording of a few questions. These suggestions were incorporated into a revised instrument. Prior to the main survey, a pilot test was conducted with a convenience sample of 110 of the firm&#x2019;s employees who also had experience with the social media platform. The main objective was to investigate if the full spectrum of the scales was utilised. A number of respondents commented about the structure of the questionnaire. The structure of the questionnaire was changed to ensure the number of questions on each page did not overwhelm respondents.</p>
<p>The final questionnaire was divided into two main sections. Section A dealt with the demographic information of the respondents, which included gender, age, profession and highest educational qualification. Section B measured the research model&#x2019;s six constructs. The measures used were adapted from relevant prior studies. To ensure that the measures were applicable to this study, we modified the questions slightly, changing, for example, the name of the online retailer to &#x2018;Facebook page&#x2019;. Items were measured by using a 7-point Likert scale which ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Items for measuring continuance intention were adapted from Bhattacherjee (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2001b</xref>) and Hsu and Chiu (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0029">2004</xref>). The construct&#x2019;s three indicators are as follows:
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>I intend to continue using the Facebook page rather than to discontinue its use.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>My intentions are to continue using the Facebook page rather than to use any traditional mediums of communication.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>I will regularly use the Facebook page in the future.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Items for measuring perceived usefulness were adapted from Davis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">1989</xref>). The construct&#x2019;s four indicators are as follows:</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>I find the Facebook page useful in finding information.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The information available is useful.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The Facebook page is useful.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>My life would be negatively affected if I had no access to the Facebook page.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>Items for measuring perceived ease of use were also adapted from Davis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">1989</xref>). The construct&#x2019;s four indicators are as follows:
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Learning to use the Facebook page was easy.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Using the Facebook page is easy.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>I find the Facebook page clear and understandable.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>It was easy for me to become skilful at using the Facebook page.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>Items for measuring social norms were adapted from Venkatesh et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2012</xref>). The construct&#x2019;s four indicators are as follows:
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>People who influence my behaviour think that I should use the Facebook page.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>People who influence my behaviour suggested that I should use the Facebook page.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>People who are important to me suggested that I should use the Facebook page.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>Items for measuring trust were adapted from Gefen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2003</xref>). The construct&#x2019;s four indicators are as follows:
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Based on past experience with the Facebook page, I know that the company cares about its customers.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Based on past experience with the Facebook page, I know that the company is honest.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Based on past experience with the Facebook page, I know that the company provides good service.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Based on past experience with the Facebook page, I know that the company is trustworthy.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>Items for measuring responsiveness were adapted from Cenfetelli, Benbasat and Sameh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0013">2008</xref>). The construct&#x2019;s three indicators are as follows:
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>I believe the Facebook page is responsive to my needs.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>If I had to obtain information, I think the Facebook page would give me prompt service.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The customer service on the Facebook page will address any concerns that I might have.</p></list-item>
</list></p>
<p>The main online survey ran over a 4-week period, starting from 2 April 2012 to 30 April 2012. At the time of the survey, the Facebook page had 5263 subscribed users. Participation via a self-administered electronic questionnaire was voluntary. Users were invited to participate on the Facebook page and were provided with a hyperlink to the online survey. A reminder was posted on the same page twice a week for 4 weeks. The user activity rate during this period was measured at approximately 20&#x0025; (1032 users). Following a single round of data collection, 303 responses were collected giving a response rate of 29&#x0025;. Ten of these responses were incomplete and were discarded. The remaining responses were screened to identify any data entry errors as well as for univariate outliers. Of these 293 cases, no cases were found to contain data errors or any outliers. The final data for analysis consisted of 293 usable responses. The number of responses received was considered sufficient based on the number of variables and the techniques that were to be used to test the hypotheses (Hair et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0027">1998</xref>). The data were analysed using correlation and multiple regression analysis with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15. Standard multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0011">
<title>Findings</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T0001">Table 1</xref> presents the profile of respondents. The age distribution of the respondents varied from 18 to 58 years with a mean age of 32 years. Of these, 59.7&#x0025; were men and 40.3&#x0025; women. There was a reasonable spread of male and female respondents. This was not surprising given the broad appeal of this particular motor vehicle brand. The brand positions its range of vehicles in the mid-range and high-end market segments. Respondents&#x2019; professions varied from 56 (19.1&#x0025;) that had a career in the finance, 77 (26.3&#x0025;) in information technology, 30 (10.2&#x0025;) in engineering, 26 (8.9&#x0025;) in education, 29 (9.9&#x0025;) in manufacturing and 75 (25.6&#x0025;) in other professions. Although respondents had diverse educational levels (high school to doctoral study), 86.7&#x0025; of the respondents reported having at least some form of tertiary education.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0001">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Profile of the participants (<italic>N</italic> = 293).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Participants</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Number</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="3"><bold>Gender</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Male</td>
<td align="center">175</td>
<td align="center">59.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Female</td>
<td align="center">118</td>
<td align="center">40.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="3"><bold>Age group</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;18&#x2013;29</td>
<td align="center">109</td>
<td align="center">37.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;30&#x2013;39</td>
<td align="center">147</td>
<td align="center">50.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;40&#x2013;49</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">9.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;50&#x2013;59</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="3"><bold>Profession</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Finance</td>
<td align="center">56</td>
<td align="center">19.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;IT</td>
<td align="center">77</td>
<td align="center">26.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Engineering</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">10.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Education</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">8.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Manufacturing</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">9.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Other</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">25.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="3"><bold>Highest level of education</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Pre-matric</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Matric</td>
<td align="center">38</td>
<td align="center">13.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Diploma</td>
<td align="center">69</td>
<td align="center">23.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Degree</td>
<td align="center">103</td>
<td align="center">35.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Post-degree</td>
<td align="center">74</td>
<td align="center">25.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Other</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">2.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) with a direct oblimin rotation of the 21 Likert scale items reflecting the variables of the study (perceived usefulness, ease of use, social norms, responsiveness, trust and continuance intention) was conducted. Prior to performing PCA, the suitability of the data for factor analysis was assessed. Inspection of the correlation matrix revealed the presence of many coefficients of 0.3 and above. The Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin value was 0.860. This exceeds the recommended value of 0.60. The Bartlett&#x2019;s test of sphericity reached statistical significance (<italic>p</italic> = 0.000), supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix. Initial PCA revealed the presence of seven factors, with eigen values exceeding 1, explaining 68.9&#x0025; of the variance cumulatively. During multiple iterations of PCA, 1 item required elimination because it failed to meet the minimum criterion of having a primary factor loading of at least 1 and cross-loaded highly on more than one factor. The item PU4, &#x2018;My life would be negatively affected if I had no access to the firm&#x2019;s Facebook page&#x2019; loaded strongly with continuance intention scale items. As a result, this item was dropped. A stable 6-factor and 21-item solution emerged and is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0002">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Mean, standard deviation and construct reliabilities.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Constructs</th>
<th align="center">Items</th>
<th align="center">Mean</th>
<th align="center">Standard deviation</th>
<th align="center">Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Usefulness</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">5.36</td>
<td align="center">1.13</td>
<td align="center">0.907</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ease of use</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">5.54</td>
<td align="center">1.08</td>
<td align="center">0.828</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Social norms</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4.27</td>
<td align="center">1.52</td>
<td align="center">0.937</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Responsiveness</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">5.22</td>
<td align="center">1.05</td>
<td align="center">0.820</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Trust</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">5.47</td>
<td align="center">1.03</td>
<td align="center">0.894</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Continuance intention</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">5.06</td>
<td align="center">1.22</td>
<td align="center">0.776</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Note: All loading were greater than 0.60. 7-point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha test was used to test the internal consistency of the scale items (Hair et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0027">1998</xref>). Results revealed sufficiently high internal consistency for all scales, ranging from 0.776 to 0.937. Results of the analysis, along with descriptive statistics (item means and standard deviations), are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<p>Continuance intention (mean = 5.06, SD = 1.22) scores indicate respondents reacted positively toward using the firm&#x2019;s Facebook page. Scores for perceived usefulness (mean = 5.36, SD = 1.13) suggest that the firm&#x2019;s Facebook page generally adds value for the majority of respondents. Perceived ease of use had the highest performance score (mean = 5.54, SD = 1.08). This shows that overall users find the firm&#x2019;s Facebook page easy to use. Scores for social norms (mean = 4.27, SD = 1.52) seem to suggest that users&#x2019; interaction with the firm&#x2019;s Facebook page is not very strongly influenced by their peers. However, this score did show the most amount of variability in responses. Responsiveness scores (mean = 5.22, SD = 1.05) show that overall users find that the firm responds to their queries. Scores for trust (mean = 5.47, SD = 1.03) performed highly. This indicates that the users perceived the firm as being honest, trustworthy and caring.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T0003">Table 3</xref> shows that the scales were tested for independence using Pearson&#x2019;s product-moment correlation. All correlations were significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01 levels. The relationship between ease of use and usefulness showed a strong, positive correlation between the two variables (<italic>r</italic> = 0.605, <italic>n</italic> = 293, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). This suggests that users&#x2019; perception of the value of the firm&#x2019;s Facebook page may be influenced by their perception of how easy it is to use the page. Responsiveness appears to have a slightly greater influence on continuance intention (<italic>r</italic> = 0.424, <italic>n</italic> = 293, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) than usefulness (<italic>r</italic> = 0.411, <italic>n</italic> = 293, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). The correlations between trust and continuance intention (<italic>r</italic> = 0.444, <italic>n</italic> = 293, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and social norms and continuance intention (<italic>r</italic> = 0.364, <italic>n</italic> = 293, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) are both moderate. The correlation analysis of responsiveness and ease of use suggests possible mediation relationships with perceived usefulness. Preliminary analyses were performed to ensure no violation of the assumptions of normality, linearity and homoscedasticity (Hair et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0027">1998</xref>). Intercorrelations among scales did not exceed 0.70, and therefore, the independence of the scales was considered adequate for this study.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0003">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Correlation matrix for usefulness, ease of use, social norms, responsiveness and trust on OBC continuance intention (<italic>N</italic> = 293).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">1</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">4</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">5</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">6</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">1. Continuance intention (DV)</td>
<td align="center">1.0</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2. Usefulness</td>
<td align="center">0.411</td>
<td align="center">1.0</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3. Ease of use</td>
<td align="center">0.360</td>
<td align="center">0.605</td>
<td align="center">1.0</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4. Social norms</td>
<td align="center">0.364</td>
<td align="center">0.363</td>
<td align="center">0.215</td>
<td align="center">1.0</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5. Responsiveness</td>
<td align="center">0.424</td>
<td align="center">0.430</td>
<td align="center">0.337</td>
<td align="center">0.302</td>
<td align="center">1.0</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6. Trust</td>
<td align="center">0.444</td>
<td align="center">0.221</td>
<td align="center">0.209</td>
<td align="center">0.339</td>
<td align="center">0.525</td>
<td align="center">1.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>DV, dependant variable.</p></fn>
<fn><p>Note: Continuance intention is the DV. All correlations are statistically significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Multiple regression analysis was used to test if the five independent variables significantly predicted the dependent continuance intention variable. The results of the multiple regression analysis in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0004">Table 4</xref> reveal that H5: trust (25.5&#x0025;), H2: perceived usefulness (18.2&#x0025;) and H4: social norms (12.5&#x0025;) jointly explain 40.4&#x0025; of the variance in social media continuance intention. The technology factor (H3: perceived ease of use) and service quality factor (H1: responsiveness) offered no significant relationship with continuance above that was explained by trust, perceived usefulness and social norms.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0004">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Multiple regression analysis of OBC continuance intention.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Independent variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Standardized beta coefficients</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Hypothesis testing</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Trust</td>
<td align="center">0.255<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0001">&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="left">H5: Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Perceived usefulness</td>
<td align="center">0.182<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0001">&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="left">H2: Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Social norms</td>
<td align="center">0.125<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0001">&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="left">H4: Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Perceived ease of use</td>
<td align="center">0.056</td>
<td align="left">H3: Not Supported</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Responsiveness</td>
<td align="center">0.060</td>
<td align="left">H1: Not Supported</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>H, hypothesis.</p></fn>
<fn><p>Note: Standardized beta coefficients are shown for the independent variables.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0001"><label>&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05; <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.404.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s0012">
<title>Discussion of the findings</title>
<p>This research examined the effect of the interrelationships between responsiveness, perceived usefulness, ease of use, social norms and trust on the users&#x2019; continuance intention. The results from the empirical study of the 293 users of a motor manufacturer&#x2019;s Facebook page found support for hypotheses 1, 3 and 5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F0002">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F0002">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Regression model results.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-19-744-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Comparing the above results with prior studies on the loyal use of online technologies, some interesting patterns emerge. Firstly, in this OBC study, social factors such as trust and social norms were stronger predictors of continuance intention when compared with utility factors such as perceived usefulness. This study attests to the growing importance of social factors in the social media context, such as OBCs (Algesheimer et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2005</xref>; Ellison et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2007</xref>). Interacting with unknown individuals in an online environment can be unpredictable and present users with overwhelming complexity. Studies have shown that the lack of trust and the absence of social norms in complex online social environments can inhibit a person&#x2019;s intentions to perform many behaviours (Gefen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">2000</xref>; Laroche et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0034">2012</xref>; Nyoni &#x0026; Velempini <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">2015</xref>). Therefore, trust and social norms can also play an important role in risk and complexity reduction in the social media-based OBC context.</p>
<p>Secondly, users place substantial value of the potential benefits of being a member of an OBC. Using an OBC enables a user to acquire more information about the brand, know more about the people in the brand community, improve user efficiency in sharing information and connecting with others, and offers a useful way to interact between brand community members (Akar &#x0026; Mardikyan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2014</xref>). These findings attest and confirm the importance of utility factors such as perceived usefulness in OBC use contexts (Akar &#x0026; Mardikyan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2014</xref>; Lin &#x0026; Lu <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2011</xref>; Ravald &#x0026; Gr&#x00F6;nroos <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0047">1996</xref>).</p>
<p>The direct relationship between perceived ease of use, responsiveness and continuance intention has little or no consequence in social media-based contexts such as OBCs. Past studies have shown that ease of use has an indirect effect on use through the usefulness of technologies (Ramayah &#x0026; Ignatius <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0046">2005</xref>). The findings also suggest that perceived ease of use and responsiveness needs are not that elusive in the social media context. Users may have also gained sufficient experience in using Facebook as well as other social networking sites. Although responsiveness and ease of use may play a less substantial role in this context, it is still important in the users&#x2019; overall evaluation of whether the OBC is useful.</p>
<p>Our findings are valuable for practitioners. A firm may experience declining usage rates or even complete discontinuance of their OBCs if they fail to take advantage of factors such as trust and perceived usefulness. The first observation in our study is the importance of the level of trust placed in the firm by users. We believe that trust is not only important in enticing the user to join the OBC because of brand familiarity but also crucial in persuading the user to participate continually (Gefen et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2003</xref>). Our findings also suggest that in interacting via the use of OBCs, management needs to affirm the notion that the firm is honest, that it provides a good service and that it cares about its customers, that is, they should leverage on the trust in their established brands. At the same time, an OBC could strengthen the trust and overall loyalty with the brand on the part of consumers.</p>
<p>Secondly, we believe that management should continually enhance the perceived usefulness of the OBC. In other words, these benefits should not be primarily ad hoc product offers (discounted apparel) but also ongoing communication of rituals (such as regular regional and national brand fests) (Algesheimer et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2005</xref>).</p>
<p>Thirdly, to stimulate continued use, we believe that managers need to understand how social media is transforming interactions in spaces such as OBCs. The findings suggest that customers that share similar social norms about the brand are more likely to interact with each other in these spaces. Managers need to take advantage of these insights by stimulating interactions between OBC members and the firm.</p>
<p>The research study has a few limitations. Firstly, this study focused on one motor manufacturing firm&#x2019;s brand. Although the choice of a single firm controlled for the potential effects of macro-level firm factors (e.g., type of customer segment), we suggest that future studies that incorporate a cross-section of brands should provide a more holistic insight into user continuance. Secondly, this study also suffered from non-response biases inherent in voluntary survey-based research. In this survey, responses were skewed toward those members who were willing to continue using the firm&#x2019;s OBC platform. However, sample demographics (age, gender and education) were comparable with the firm&#x2019;s &#x2018;typical&#x2019; customers. Nevertheless, future studies can also focus on those respondents who discontinued using the OBC platform. Thirdly, although cognitive beliefs were the focal point of this study, affective factors such as satisfaction which were not considered in this study can sometimes be more important in the user&#x2019;s post-evaluation of a technology (Bhattacherjee <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2001b</xref>). Future studies can integrate the cognitive factors established here with affective factors, to provide a more holistic understanding of OBC loyalty.</p>
<sec id="s20013">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our study provides evidence that TRA is appropriate to measure different cognitive dimensions that users evaluate when deciding whether to continue using a social media-based OBC. Data collected from a field survey of 293 social media users of a motor manufacturer&#x2019;s OBC provided partial empirical support for the proposed model. The results supported hypotheses relating to the positive influence of trust, perceived usefulness and social norms on user continuance intentions. The major contribution of this study is that socially related factors such as trust and social norms are two dominant predictors of continuance in the OBC context. Firms intending to provide a social media-based OBC are encouraged to prioritise requirements that emphasise the social needs of the users to promote continued use and to enhance overall brand loyalty.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<sec id="s20014">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20015">
<title>Authors&#x2019; contributions</title>
<p>R.N. was the study leader and L.M.P. was the Masters student. Both authors made equal contributions in terms of the writing and analysis of this article.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<ref-list id="references">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="CIT0001"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Adjei</surname>, <given-names>M.T</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Noble</surname>, <given-names>S.M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Noble</surname>, <given-names>C.H</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The influence of C2C communications in online brand communities on customer purchase behavior</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</italic></source> <volume>38</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>634</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>653</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0178-5">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0178-5</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0002"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ajzen</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1991</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The theory of planned behavior</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</italic></source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0003"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Akar</surname>, <given-names>E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Mardikyan</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Analyzing factors affecting users&#x2019; behavior intention to use social media: Twitter</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Business and Social Science</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>(<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0004"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Algesheimer</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Dholakia</surname>, <given-names>U.M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Herrmann</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2005</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European Car Clubs</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Marketing</italic></source> <volume>69</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363">http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0005"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bagozzi</surname>, <given-names>R.P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Lee</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2002</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Social Psychology Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>65</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>226</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>247</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3090121">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3090121</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0006"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bertot</surname>, <given-names>J.C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Jaeger</surname>, <given-names>P.T</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Grimes</surname>, <given-names>J.M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Government Information Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>264</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0007"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bhattacherjee</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2001a</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Decision Support Systems</italic></source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>214</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00111-7">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00111-7</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0008"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bhattacherjee</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2001b</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MIS Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>25</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>370</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250921">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250921</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0009"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Boorstin</surname>, <given-names>D.J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1974</year>, <source><italic>The Americans: The democratic experience</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Random House</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0010"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Burnkrant</surname>, <given-names>R.E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Cousineau</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1975</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Consumer Research</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208633">http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208633</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0011"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Carlson</surname>, <given-names>B.D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Suter</surname>, <given-names>T.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Brown</surname>, <given-names>T.J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Social versus psychological brand community: The role of psychological sense of brand community</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Research</italic></source> <volume>61</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>284</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>291</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.022">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.022</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0012"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Caruana</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Caruana</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Money</surname>, <given-names>A.H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Money</surname>, <given-names>A.H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Berthon</surname>, <given-names>P.R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Berthon</surname>, <given-names>P.R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2000</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Service quality and satisfaction &#x2013; The moderating role of value</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>European Journal of Marketing</italic></source> <volume>34</volume>(<issue>11/12</issue>), <fpage>1338</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1353</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560010764432">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560010764432</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0013"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cenfetelli</surname>, <given-names>R.T</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Benbasat</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Sameh</surname>, <given-names>A.-N</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Addressing the what and how of Online services: Positioning supporting-services functionality and service quality for business-to-consumer success</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Information Systems Research</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0163">http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0163</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0014"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Chan</surname>, <given-names>F.K.Y</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Thong</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Venkatesh</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Brown</surname>, <given-names>S.A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hu</surname>, <given-names>P.J.H</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Tam</surname>, <given-names>K.-Y</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of the Association for Information Systems</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>519</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>549</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0015"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cheung</surname>, <given-names>C.M.K</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Chiu</surname>, <given-names>P.Y</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Lee</surname>, <given-names>M.K.O</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2011</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook?</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Computers in Human Behavior</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1343</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0016"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cialdini</surname>, <given-names>R.B</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Trost</surname>, <given-names>M.R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1998</year>, <source><italic>Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance</italic></source>, <publisher-name>McGraw-Hill</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0017"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Bagozzi</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Warshaw</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1989</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Management Science 35</italic></source>(<volume>8</volume>), <fpage>982</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1003</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982">http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0018"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dwyer</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hiltz</surname>, <given-names>S.R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Passerini</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2007</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Americas The</italic></source> <volume>123</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0019"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ellison</surname>, <given-names>N.B</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Steinfield</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Lampe</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2007</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The benefits of Facebook &#x201C;friends&#x201D;: Social capital and college students&#x2019; use of online social network sites</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1168</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0020"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Fishbein</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Ajzen</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1975</year>, <source><italic>Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Addison-Wesley Publishing Company</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Reading, MA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0021"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Fogel</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Nehmad</surname>, <given-names>E</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Computers in Human Behavior</italic></source> <volume>25</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0022"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gefen</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2000</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Omega</italic></source> <volume>28</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>725</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>737</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0023"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gefen</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Karahanna</surname>, <given-names>E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Straub</surname>, <given-names>D.W</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Trust and TAM in Online shopping: An integrated model</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MiS Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0024"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gr&#x00F6;nroos</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1996</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Relationship marketing: Strategic and tactical implications</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Management Decision</italic></source> <volume>34</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749610113613">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749610113613</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0025"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gupta</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>., &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Harris</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Research</italic></source> <volume>63</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1041</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1049</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.015">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.015</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0026"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ha</surname>, <given-names>C.L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1998</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The theory of reasoned action applied to brand loyalty</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Product &#x0026; Brand Management</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10610429810209737">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10610429810209737</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0027"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hair</surname>, <given-names>J.F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Anderson</surname>, <given-names>R.E</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Tatham</surname>, <given-names>R.L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Black</surname>, <given-names>W.C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1998</year>, <source><italic>Multivariate data analysis</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Prentice-Hall International Inc.</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Englewood Cliffs, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0028"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hoffman</surname>, <given-names>D.L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Fodor</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing?</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MIT Sloan Management Review</italic></source> <volume>52</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0029"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hsu</surname>, <given-names>M.-H</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Chiu</surname>, <given-names>C.-M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2004</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Behaviour &#x0026; Information Technology</italic></source> <volume>23</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>373</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669969">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669969</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0030"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kettinger</surname>, <given-names>W.J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Hu</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Why people continue to use social networking services: Developing a comprehensive model</article-title>&#x2019;, in <source><italic>ICIS 2008 Proceedings</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <comment>Paper 89, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/89">http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/89</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0031"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kietzmann</surname>, <given-names>J.H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hermkens</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>McCarthy</surname>, <given-names>I.P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Silvestre</surname>, <given-names>B.S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2011</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Business Horizons</italic></source> <volume>54</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>241</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0032"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ku</surname>, <given-names>Y.C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Chen</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Zhang</surname>, <given-names>H</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2013</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Why do users continue using social networking sites? An exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Information and Management</italic></source> <volume>50</volume>(<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>571</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>581</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.011">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.011</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0033"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Laroche</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Habibi</surname>, <given-names>M.R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Richard</surname>, <given-names>M.O</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2013</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media?</article-title>&#x2019; <source><italic>International Journal of Information Management</italic></source> <volume>33</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0034"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Laroche</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Habibi</surname>, <given-names>M.R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Richard</surname>, <given-names>M.O</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Sankaranarayanan</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2012</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Computers in Human Behavior</italic></source> <volume>28</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1755</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1767</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0035"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Lin</surname>, <given-names>K.Y</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Lu</surname>, <given-names>H.P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2011</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Computers in Human Behavior</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1152</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1161</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0036"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mangold</surname>, <given-names>W.G</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Faulds</surname>, <given-names>D.J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Business Horizons</italic></source> <volume>52</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>365</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0037"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Marchi</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Giachetti</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>De Gennaro</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2011</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Extending lead-user theory to online brand communities: The case of the community Ducati</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Technovation</italic></source> <volume>31</volume>(<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.04.005">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.04.005</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0038"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>McAlexander</surname>, <given-names>J.H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Schouten</surname>, <given-names>J.W</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Koenig</surname>, <given-names>H.F</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Building brand community</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Marketing</italic></source> <volume>66</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451">http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0039"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Moon</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Kim</surname>, <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2001</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Extending the TAM for a World-Wide Web context</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Information &#x0026; Management</italic></source> <volume>38</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>230</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0040"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Muniz</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>O&#x2019;Guinn</surname>, <given-names>T.C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2001</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Brand community</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Consumer Research</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>412</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>432</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/319618">http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/319618</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0041"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Naidoo</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Who am I online? Examining voluntary use as symbolic-collective action</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>The Information Society</italic></source> <volume>30</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0042"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nielsen</surname></string-name></person-group>, <year>2009</year>, <source><italic>Nielsen&#x2019;s Social Media QuickTake: May 2009</italic></source>, <comment>viewed 15 January 2014, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/newswire/uploads/2009/06/nielsen_pr_090619.pdf">http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/newswire/uploads/2009/06/nielsen_pr_090619.pdf</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0043"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nyoni</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Velempini</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2015</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Data protection laws and privacy on Facebook</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>SA Journal of Information Management</italic></source> <volume>17</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v17i1.636">https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v17i1.636</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0044"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Parasuraman</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Zeithaml</surname>, <given-names>V.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Berry</surname>, <given-names>L.L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1988</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>SEVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Retailing</italic></source> <volume>64</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0045"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Pitt</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Watson</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Kavan</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1995</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Management Information Systems Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249687j">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249687j</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0046"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ramayah</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Ignatius</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2005</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Impact of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment on intention to shop Online</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>ICFAI Journal of Systems Management (IJSM)</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0047"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ravald</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Gr&#x00F6;nroos</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1996</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The value concept and relationship marketing</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>European Journal of Marketing</italic></source> <volume>30</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569610106626">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569610106626</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0048"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rigby</surname>, <given-names>D.K</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Reichheld</surname>, <given-names>F.F</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Schefter</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2002</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Avoid the four perils of CRM</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Harvard Business Review</italic></source> <volume>80</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>101</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0049"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Statista</collab></person-group>, <year>2015</year>, <source><italic>Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide from 3rd quarter 2008 to 3rd quarter 2014 (in millions)</italic></source>, <comment>viewed 01 February 2016, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/">http://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0050"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tsai</surname>, <given-names>H.-T</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Bagozzi</surname>, <given-names>R.P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MIS Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>38</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0051"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Venkatesh</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>F.D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2000</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Management Science</italic></source> <volume>46</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0052"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Venkatesh</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Morris</surname>, <given-names>M.G</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>G.B</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Davis</surname>, <given-names>F.D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MIS Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>425</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>478</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0053"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Venkatesh</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Thong</surname>, <given-names>J.Y.L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Xu</surname>, <given-names>X</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2012</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MIS Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>36</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0054"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Viljoen</surname>, <given-names>K.L</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Dube</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Murisi</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2016</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Facebook versus Twitter: Which one is more credible in a South African context?</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>SA Journal of Information Management</italic></source> <volume>18</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v18i1.718">http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v18i1.718</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0055"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Xu</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Chan</surname>, <given-names>H</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Understanding users&#x2019; continuance of Facebook: The role of general and specific computer self-efficacy</article-title>&#x2019;, in <source><italic>ICIS 2008 Proceedings</italic></source>. Paper <fpage>168</fpage>, <comment>from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/168">http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/168</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0056"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>E.S.-T</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Chou</surname>, <given-names>N.P.-Y</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Consumer characteristics, social influence, and system factors on Online group-buying repurchasing intention</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Electronic Commerce Research</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0057"><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>Y.K</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Datta</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2006</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Understand IS continuance: A technology commitment perspective</article-title>&#x2019;, in <source><italic>ICIS 2006 Proceedings</italic></source>. Paper <fpage>77</fpage>, <comment>from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2006/77">http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2006/77</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0058"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zeithmal</surname>, <given-names>V.A</given-names></string-name></person-group>. <year>1988</year>. <article-title>Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence</article-title>. <source><italic>Journal of Marketing</italic></source> <volume>52</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0059"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zeithaml</surname>, <given-names>V.A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2002</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Service excellence in electronic channels</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Managing Service Quality</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0060"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zeithaml</surname>, <given-names>V.A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Berry</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Parasuraman</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1996</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The behavioral consequences of service quality</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Marketing</italic></source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn><p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Potgieter, L.M. &#x0026; Naidoo, R., 2017, &#x2018;Factors explaining user loyalty in a social media-based brand community&#x2019;, <italic>South African Journal of Information Management</italic> 19(1), a744. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.744">https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.744</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>