<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SAJIM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>South African Journal of Information Management</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2078-1865</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1560-683X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>AOSIS</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SAJIM-28-2179</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/sajim.v28i1.2179</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni&#x2019;s logistics SMEs: A conceptual model</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3707-5022</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Morema</surname>
<given-names>Tshepiso P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-4285</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Adeyelure</surname>
<given-names>Tope S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-887X</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Seaba</surname>
<given-names>Tshinakaho R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0002">2</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="AF0001"><label>1</label>Department of Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa</aff>
<aff id="AF0002"><label>2</label>Department of IT Management and Governance, Faculty of Engineering, the Built Environment and Technology (FEBT), Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><bold>Corresponding author:</bold> Tshepiso Morema, <email xlink:href="212469408@tut4life.ac.za">212469408@tut4life.ac.za</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>08</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>28</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<elocation-id>2179</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>01</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2026. The Authors</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Logistics small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Ekurhuleni face operational inefficiencies due to manual processes and outdated systems. Although cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions offer scalable and cost-effective improvements, adoption remains limited.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st2">
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>This study aimed to develop a Cloud ERP Adoption Model (CEAM) by identifying organisational, technological and environmental factors influencing adoption. The study was guided by the Technology&#x2013;Organisation&#x2013;Environment (TOE) framework, with additional constructs from diffusion of innovation theory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st3">
<title>Method</title>
<p>A quantitative approach was used. Data were collected from 123 participants, including information technology (IT) personnel, decision-makers and logistics managers in Ekurhuleni-based SMEs. Analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 31.0.0.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and multiple regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st4">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Significant relationships were observed across constructs (<italic>r</italic> = 0.55&#x2013;0.84; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). All predictors, except skills (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = &#x2013;0.113; <italic>p</italic> = 0.799), significantly influenced adoption, with 10 of 11 hypotheses supported.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Cloud ERP adoption among logistics SMEs is driven primarily by organisational readiness, leadership commitment, financial capacity and strategic intent rather than technical attributes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st6">
<title>Contribution</title>
<p>The study contributes by proposing an empirically validated CEAM to support SMEs, technology vendors and policymakers in advancing digital transformation.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cloud ERP</kwd>
<kwd>logistics SMEs</kwd>
<kwd>conceptual model</kwd>
<kwd>adoption</kwd>
<kwd>Ekurhuleni</kwd>
<kwd>South Africa</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement><bold>Funding information</bold> This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s0001">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Recent developments in information and communication technology (ICT) have significantly reshaped business operations globally, particularly in enterprise computing (Zamani <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">2022</xref>). Traditional enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are increasingly unable to keep pace with evolving technologies or integrate effectively with modern digital platforms, whereas cloud-based ERP solutions draw on advanced analytics, machine learning and Internet of Things capabilities to enhance efficiency and support innovation (Haddara, G&#x00F8;thesen &#x0026; Langseth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2022</xref>). These developments are especially relevant for logistics small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which play a crucial role in stimulating economic activity, enabling market access and supporting regional development. In Ekurhuleni, a major logistics hub in South Africa, SMEs face rising operational demands driven by e-commerce, increased warehousing needs and complex coordination requirements (Straube <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0040">2023</xref>; Yan, Wang &#x0026; Chen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">2023</xref>). Despite the sector&#x2019;s importance, many logistics SMEs continue to rely on outdated or fragmented systems, resulting in delays, data inaccuracies, higher operational costs and reduced competitiveness (Al-Amin et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2023</xref>). Modern cloud ERP systems offer a pathway to overcome these inefficiencies by improving coordination, increasing transparency and enhancing decision-making (Nagahawatta, Singh &#x0026; Kumara <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">2024</xref>). Although cloud ERP adoption has increased globally, existing research has paid limited attention to the specific conditions and challenges experienced by logistics SMEs, particularly in developing regions. Much of the existing literature focuses on large organisations or general SME contexts, leaving a gap in understanding the unique environmental, organisational and technological factors that influence adoption within logistics-intensive economies (Ahmed, Oliver &#x0026; Rahim <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2020</xref>; Barbieri, Sott &#x0026; Monticelli <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">2024</xref>). Small and medium enterprises in the Ekurhuleni region face distinct constraints such as limited information technology (IT) expertise, financial pressures, organisational resistance to change and infrastructural challenges such as load shedding (Saah <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0036">2021</xref>). These factors shape their readiness for cloud-based solutions and highlight the need for research that addresses their specific circumstances. Understanding these dynamics is essential, as cloud ERP systems have the potential to improve operational resilience, reduce dependency on local infrastructure and strengthen long-term sustainability (Alsharari, Al-Shboul &#x0026; Alteneiji <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2020</xref>; Hadidi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0013">2020</xref>). Despite these recognised opportunities and constraints, existing cloud ERP adoption studies have largely focused on general SME contexts or specific national settings, with limited empirical research examining how technological, organisational and environmental factors collectively influence cloud ERP adoption within logistics-focused SMEs in Ekurhuleni. Prior studies typically address these determinants in isolation or outside the logistics sector, highlighting a contextual and empirical gap that motivates the central research problem of this study (Jayeola et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2022</xref>; Nagahawatta et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">2024</xref>; Shahadat et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">2023</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s20002">
<title>Research problem</title>
<p>The logistics sector in Ekurhuleni acts as a substantial contributor to South Africa&#x2019;s economic expansion, job creation and innovation. However, logistics SMEs continue to face a range of operational and strategic challenges, including financial constraints, limited management resources, high implementation costs and persistent concerns over data security. While cloud ERP systems are increasingly being adopted globally to enhance efficiency and competitiveness, SMEs in Ekurhuleni remain hesitant because of these barriers.</p>
<p>Existing research on cloud ERP adoption has largely focused on large organisations or broad SME environments, with limited consideration of the specific dynamics that characterise logistics SMEs in emerging economies. Studies such as Barbieri et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">2024</xref>) and Ahmed et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2020</xref>) examine adoption in larger corporate settings and therefore do not capture the unique operational pressures, resource limitations and infrastructural challenges experienced by smaller logistics firms. This lack of focused investigation has created a knowledge gap, leaving logistics SMEs without clear guidance on how to navigate adoption barriers or optimise cloud ERP implementation. Successful cloud ERP adoption has the potential to transform logistics SMEs by integrating core business functions such as human resources, finance, sales, operations management and supplier coordination into a single, efficient platform. Additionally, cloud ERP vendors increasingly provide enhanced cybersecurity and compliance mechanisms, reducing the financial and technical burden typically associated with in-house IT infrastructure (Murigi &#x0026; Mutuku <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0025">2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Scholars, including Manigandan and Raghuram (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">2024</xref>), Haddara et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2022</xref>), Barbieri et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">2024</xref>) and Shahadat et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">2023</xref>), have therefore emphasised the need to develop context-specific models that support cloud ERP adoption among SMEs, especially within emerging economies. In response to this gap, the present study aims to develop a model tailored to the adoption of cloud ERP in logistics SMEs within Ekurhuleni, offering a structured framework that informs decision-making and supports successful implementation. Consequently, the study&#x2019;s research objectives are formulated to systematically investigate the factors influencing cloud ERP adoption, assess the challenges faced by logistics SMEs and evaluate the perceived operational and strategic benefits of cloud-based solutions. This approach ensures the development of actionable insights that can guide both practitioners and policymakers. Building on these intentions, the study&#x2019;s aim and objectives were structured to provide a clear pathway for developing a comprehensive model that supports effective cloud ERP adoption within Ekurhuleni&#x2019;s logistics SMEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20003">
<title>Research aim and objectives</title>
<p>The study aimed to develop a model for the adoption of cloud ERP in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs. To achieve this aim, the study pursued the following objectives:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><italic>To assess existing resource-planning challenges faced in the absence of cloud ERP in SMEs</italic>.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>To identify factors influencing the adoption of cloud ERP</italic>.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>To determine the influence of identified factors on adopting cloud ERP in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs</italic>.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><italic>To design a model for adopting cloud ERP in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs</italic>.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>Having outlined the aim and objectives, the study required a strong theoretical foundation to guide the identification of relevant factors, interpret relationships among variables and support the eventual design of the model. To provide this foundation, the research is anchored in established technology-adoption frameworks that offer insight into how organisations assess, accept and implement new technological innovations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20004">
<title>Related theoretical frameworks</title>
<sec id="s30005">
<title>Related literature</title>
<p>Recent studies highlight growing interest in cloud ERP adoption among SMEs but also reveal clear contextual gaps. Christiansen, Haddara and Langseth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2022</xref>) emphasise the need for more context-specific adoption models, noting that much of the existing research does not adequately reflect sector-specific demands. Tongsuksai, Mathrani and Weerasinghe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">2023</xref>) provide valuable vendor-based insights from New Zealand SMEs, yet their findings do not address the realities of developing economies. Work from India (Mandava <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0020">2024</xref>) and research in South African SOEs (Nakeng, Mokwena &#x0026; Moeti <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0027">2021</xref>) further demonstrate the importance of factors such as security, organisational readiness and leadership support, but these studies are limited to different organisational contexts. Authors such as Mohammed et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2023</xref>) and Christiansen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2022</xref>) highlight the need for context-specific, SME-focused cloud ERP adoption models (CEAMs), noting that existing studies often reflect limited geographical contexts and insufficient differentiation across organisational types. This study responds by proposing a model tailored to the operational, environmental and infrastructural conditions of logistics SMEs in Ekurhuleni.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30006">
<title>Related frameworks informing the conceptual model</title>
<p>Building on prior work by Razzaq et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2021</xref>), who integrated diffusion of innovation (DOI), TOE, Change Management Theory and the Iacovou model to conceptualise cloud ERP adoption in Malaysian SMEs, this study extends and contextualises that approach for logistics SMEs in Ekurhuleni. Diffusion of innovation contributes constructs such as trialability, system quality, security, compatibility and complexity, which represent key technological perceptions influencing adoption decisions. Technology-Organisation-Environment broadens this perspective by incorporating organisational readiness, financial capability, perceived benefits and environmental pressures such as competition and regulation. Change management theory further emphasises the importance of leadership support, effective communication and staff involvement in driving successful technological change. Meanwhile, the Iacovou model reinforces SME-specific determinants, including perceived benefits, internal readiness and external pressure (Soliman &#x0026; Noorliza <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">2022</xref>). Collectively, these theoretical lenses inform the Technological Decision Contextual Integration (TDCI) framework&#x2019;s multidimensional view of cloud ERP adoption, demonstrating why a comprehensive, integrated model is necessary for understanding adoption behaviour in SMEs.</p>
<p>Tongsuksai et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">2023</xref>) merge TOE and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to assess both organisational readiness and user acceptance. Technology Enterprise User Trust (TEUT) emphasises top management support, organisational readiness, financial capacity, social influence and facilitating conditions while highlighting the critical role of trust, reliability and data privacy (Bayag &#x0026; Madimabe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2024</xref>). This integration ensures that the proposed model accounts for both organisational structures and end-user behaviour. Mohammed et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2023</xref>) Cloud ERP Implementation and Technology Integration (CERPIT) model integrates DOI, TOE and the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) success model, emphasising infrastructure, compatibility, cost-efficiency, system quality and security. Its relevance lies in providing a multi-layered understanding of cloud ERP adoption in developing-country SMEs. This study uses CERPIT insights to reinforce the importance of technological fit and organisational readiness in logistics contexts. Together, these frameworks provide a theoretically coherent basis for the CEAM. Specifically, DOI theory contributed the technological perception constructs &#x2013; system quality, complexity, compatibility, trialability and security. The TOE framework contributed organisational constructs &#x2013; top management support, financial capability and skills &#x2013; as well as the environmental constructs of competitive edge and vendor support. Technology Enterprise User Trust contributed organisational culture as a focal construct, emphasising trust and internal readiness. Cloud ERP Implementation and Technology Integration reinforced the cross-cutting importance of vendor support and system quality within developing-country SME contexts. Together, these frameworks support the use of an integrated, SME-focused conceptual model. Each framework contributes a different but complementary view: technology readiness, organisational capability, leadership and change support, environmental pressure and user acceptance. When combined, they provide a more complete understanding of cloud ERP adoption, particularly for logistics SMEs, where adoption decisions are influenced by limited resources, operational demands, regulatory requirements and employee acceptance. The proposed model therefore reflects the practical realities faced by logistics SMEs while remaining grounded in established theory.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s20007">
<title>Quantitative content analysis</title>
<p>Following Parry&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2020</xref>) approach, a quantitative content analysis was conducted as part of a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-style bibliometric review. Relevant studies were identified through structured searches of academic databases using predefined keywords related to cloud ERP adoption and SMEs. Articles were screened for relevance, duplicates were removed, and only peer-reviewed empirical studies were retained. Frequency analysis was then applied to the final sample to identify the most commonly cited cloud ERP adoption factors, which informed the development of the conceptual model. The frequency results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T0001">Table 1</xref>) revealed that compatibility (95), security (90) and complexity (86) were the most dominant technological themes, emphasising SMEs&#x2019; concerns around integration, data protection and system usability. Organisational factors such as top management support (66) and financial capability (60) were also prominent, highlighting leadership commitment and resource readiness as critical enablers. Additional recurring factors included vendor support (77), system quality (76), skills (50) and organisational structure (60), pointing to the significance of both internal capacity and external support mechanisms.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0001">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Quantitative content analysis.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Factors</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Frequencies</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">System quality</td>
<td align="center">76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Complexity</td>
<td align="center">86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Compatibility</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Trialability</td>
<td align="center">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Security</td>
<td align="center">90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Competitive edge</td>
<td align="center">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Vendor support</td>
<td align="center">77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Top management support</td>
<td align="center">66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Financial capability</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Skills</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organisational structure</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To validate and extend the literature-derived frequency counts, a cross-validation step was applied by mapping each identified factor onto the corresponding survey construct measured in the primary study. For each construct, three descriptive statistics were computed from the study&#x2019;s dataset (<italic>n</italic> = 123) using IBM SPSS Version 31.0.0.0: (1) the composite mean score (<italic>M</italic>), (2) the standard deviation (SD) and (3) the percentage of respondents who agreed or strongly agreed (&#x2265; 4 on the five-point Likert scale). The formulae applied are presented in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1">Equation 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD2">Equation 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD3">Equation 3</xref>:</p>
<sec id="s30008">
<title><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1">Equation 1</xref>: Composite mean score (<italic>M</italic>)</title>
<disp-formula id="FD1"><alternatives><mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-28-2179-e001.tif"/></alternatives><label>[Eqn 1]</label></disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>M<sub>i</sub></italic> = composite mean for construct <italic>i, n</italic> = number of respondents (123), <italic>k</italic> = number of items per construct (3) and <italic>x<sub>ijx</sub></italic> = Likert rating given by respondent <italic>j</italic> on item <italic>k</italic> of construct <italic>i</italic> (scale: 1&#x2013;5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30009">
<title><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD2">Equation 2</xref>: Standard deviation (SD)</title>
<disp-formula id="FD2"><alternatives><mml:math display="block" id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SD</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x221A;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-28-2179-e002.tif"/></alternatives><label>[Eqn 2]</label></disp-formula>
<p>where SD<italic><sub>i</sub></italic> = standard deviation for construct <italic>i, N</italic> = total number of individual item responses for construct <italic>i</italic> (<italic>N</italic> = <italic>n</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>k</italic> = 123 &#x00D7; 3 = 369), <italic>x<sub>ij</sub></italic> = individual item response <italic>r</italic> for construct <italic>i</italic> and <italic>M<sub>i</sub></italic> = composite mean for construct <italic>i</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30010">
<title><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD3">Equation 3</xref>: Percentage agreement (&#x0025; agree OR strongly agree)</title>
<disp-formula id="FD3"><alternatives><mml:math display="block" id="M3"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x0025;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Agree</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-28-2179-e003.tif"/></alternatives><label>[Eqn 3]</label></disp-formula>
<p>where &#x0025;Agree<italic><sub>i</sub></italic> = percentage of item responses rated &#x2265; 4 for construct <italic>i, f<sub>i</sub></italic> (&#x2265; 4) = frequency of responses rated 4 or 5 across all items and respondents for construct <italic>i, N<sub>i</sub></italic> = total number of individual item responses for construct <italic>i</italic> (= 369 for all constructs except compatibility, where one item had a missing response, giving <italic>N<sub>i</sub></italic> = 368). To illustrate <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD3">Equation (3)</xref> concretely: for security, 300 of the 369 item responses were rated &#x2265; 4. Therefore, &#x0025;Agree (Security) = (300 / 369) &#x00D7; 100 = 81.3&#x0025;, rounding to 88.5&#x0025; when computed on the composite respondent-level mean scores (i.e. respondents whose average across the three security items was &#x2265; 4.0). The composite-level calculation was used throughout <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref>, as it better reflects the respondent&#x2019;s overall position on a construct rather than treating each item independently. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref> presents the resulting descriptive statistics alongside the literature frequency counts from <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0001">Table 1</xref>, enabling a direct comparison between what the scholarly literature emphasises and how logistics SME practitioners in Ekurhuleni actually rated each factor. This cross-validation step confirms empirical convergence between the bibliometric signal and the primary data, and it identifies areas where practitioner perceptions diverge from the weight of academic emphasis.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0002">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Cross-validation of content analysis factors against survey data (<italic>N</italic> = 123).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Factor</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Literature frequency</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>M</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">SD</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; agree OR strongly agree</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Compatibility</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
<td align="center">4.041</td>
<td align="center">0.933</td>
<td align="center">81.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Security</td>
<td align="center">90</td>
<td align="center">4.189</td>
<td align="center">0.803</td>
<td align="center">88.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Complexity</td>
<td align="center">86</td>
<td align="center">4.091</td>
<td align="center">0.901</td>
<td align="center">85.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Trialability</td>
<td align="center">80</td>
<td align="center">4.142</td>
<td align="center">0.960</td>
<td align="center">84.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Competitive edge</td>
<td align="center">80</td>
<td align="center">4.174</td>
<td align="center">0.908</td>
<td align="center">87.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Vendor support</td>
<td align="center">77</td>
<td align="center">4.159</td>
<td align="center">0.966</td>
<td align="center">87.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">System quality</td>
<td align="center">76</td>
<td align="center">4.242</td>
<td align="center">0.894</td>
<td align="center">87.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Top management support</td>
<td align="center">66</td>
<td align="center">4.174</td>
<td align="center">0.908</td>
<td align="center">86.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Financial capability</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
<td align="center">4.130</td>
<td align="center">0.904</td>
<td align="center">84.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organisational culture</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
<td align="center">4.212</td>
<td align="center">0.905</td>
<td align="center">86.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Skills</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">4.097</td>
<td align="center">0.957</td>
<td align="center">86.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>M</italic>, mean; SD, standard deviation.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref> reveals a high degree of convergence between the literature-derived frequency rankings and the survey mean scores. All 11 factors recorded composite mean scores above 4.0 on the five-point Likert scale, with between 81.4&#x0025; and 88.5&#x0025; of respondents rating each factor at four or higher (computed using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD3">Equation (3)</xref>, indicating uniformly strong practitioner endorsement across all constructs. This convergence provides dual validation for the factor selection underpinning the CEAM: the factors are not only theoretically prominent in the cloud ERP adoption literature but also are practically perceived as significant by logistics SME practitioners in Ekurhuleni. Notably, security returned both the second-highest literature frequency count (90) and the second-highest survey mean score (<italic>M</italic> = 4.189, SD = 0.803, computed via <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1">Equation 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD2">Equation 2</xref>), with 88.5&#x0025; of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing, reinforcing its centrality as both an adoption enabler and a potential barrier. System quality, despite having the eighth-highest literature frequency count (76), recorded the highest survey mean score (<italic>M</italic> = 4.242, SD = 0.894) and the highest agreement rate (87.6&#x0025;), suggesting that logistics SME practitioners in Ekurhuleni attach greater practical importance to system performance than the broader academic literature implies. This finding is consistent with the operational dependency of logistics SMEs on real-time data accuracy and system reliability. Conversely, skills recorded the lowest literature frequency (50) and the lowest survey mean score (<italic>M</italic> = 4.097, SD = 0.957), consistent with the pattern, subsequently confirmed in the regression analysis, that skills availability is a less decisive adoption determinant in cloud ERP contexts relative to organisational and strategic factors. These cross-validated results strengthen confidence in the construct selection and reinforce the theoretical coherence of the proposed CEAM, providing a methodologically sound basis for proceeding to conceptual model development.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s20011">
<title>Conceptual model</title>
<p>The proposed framework includes technological, organisational and environmental dimensions. Its primary objective is to support logistics SMEs in Ekurhuleni in adopting cloud ERP solutions. To achieve this, the model incorporates relevant elements from the TOE and DOI frameworks while integrating conceptual insights from existing models such as TDCI, TEUT and CERPIT. This synthesis aims to create a distinctive approach that enhances adoption efficiency. Specifically, TDCI emphasises technological attributes within organisations, including constructs such as system quality, complexity, compatibility, trialability and security, with a specific emphasis on the technological requirements of the logistics sector. Technology Enterprise User Trust emphasises the organisational aspects influencing technology adoption, focusing on internal readiness and management support, reflected here by top management support and organisational readiness as focal constructs. Cloud ERP Implementation and Technology Integration addresses external environmental factors, particularly vendor support and competitive advantage, offering insight into how logistics SMEs can leverage external support to gain an edge. The resulting CEAM integrates organisational, environmental and critical technological factors that affect adoption within Ekurhuleni&#x2019;s logistics SMEs. The constructs encompass system quality, complexity, compatibility, trialability, security, competitive edge, vendor support, top management support and organisational culture, with cloud ERP adoption as the dependent variable. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F0001">Figure 1</xref> reference: &#x2018;Conceptual model for cloud ERP adoption&#x2019;.</p>
<fig id="F0001">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Proposed conceptual model.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-28-2179-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s20012">
<title>Proposed model and hypotheses formulation</title>
<p>H1: System quality will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Razzaq et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2021</xref>, Amini &#x0026; Jahanbakhsh Javid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2023</xref>).</p>
<p>H2: Complexity will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Tongsuksai et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">2023</xref>, Marinho et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">2021</xref>).</p>
<p>H3: Compatibility will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Ahmed et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2020</xref>, Cheung et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0010">2023b</xref>).</p>
<p>H4: Trialability will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Tongsuksai et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">2023</xref>).</p>
<p>H5: Security will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Mohammed et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2023</xref>).</p>
<p>H6: Competitive edge will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Prakash et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0033">2022</xref>).</p>
<p>H7: Vendor support will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Haddara et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2022</xref>, Christiansen et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2022</xref>).</p>
<p>H8: Top management support will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Jayeola et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2022</xref>).</p>
<p>H9: Financial capability will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Oranefo, Eke &#x0026; Egbunike <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0031">2024</xref>).</p>
<p>H10: Skills will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs (Hanandeh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2025</xref>).</p>
<p>H11: Organisational culture will affect cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni logistics SMEs.</p>
<p>Overall, the theoretical and conceptual models discussed provide the foundation for understanding the factors influencing cloud ERP adoption in logistics SMEs. They guide the development of the proposed model and inform the methodological choices of the study. The next section outlines the research methodology used to investigate these factors.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0013">
<title>Research methods and design</title>
<p>This study adopted a positivist, quantitative research design, underpinned by a deductive approach in which theory-derived hypotheses were tested against empirical data (Saunders, Lewis &#x0026; Thornhill <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0037">2023</xref>). A cross-sectional survey strategy was employed, consistent with established practice in information systems adoption research, as it enables efficient collection of comparable data across a population at a single point in time (Vomberg &#x0026; Klarmann <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">2021</xref>). A mono-method quantitative design was selected to ensure measurement objectivity and analytical rigour. The use of a quantitative approach is appropriate given that the study sought to identify, measure and test relationships among well-defined adoption constructs rather than explore subjective meanings or experiences (Adeyemi <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0001">2024</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s20014">
<title>Data collection</title>
<p>Data were collected through a structured, closed-ended questionnaire administered online using Google Forms. The questionnaire was distributed via email and WhatsApp to middle and senior managers, including IT and operations personnel within logistics SMEs. All responses were captured electronically through Google Forms, ensuring efficient data collection and accurate data recording.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20015">
<title>Questionnaire structure</title>
<p>The questionnaire included three main sections:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Demographic information capturing organisational size, participant role and experience.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Knowledge screening assessing familiarity with ERP and cloud computing.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Measures of study constructs including system quality, complexity, compatibility, trialability, security, top management support, financial capability, vendor support, skills, organisational culture, competitive edge and cloud ERP adoption.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>All items were measured on a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) and adapted from validated instruments used in prior technology-adoption research, ensuring content validity. Data were checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency before analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20016">
<title>Sampling techniques</title>
<p>The process of choosing a subset of a specified population to participate in observation or analysis in accordance with the goals of the study is known as sampling (Nanjundeswaraswamy &#x0026; Divakar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0028">2021</xref>). The study population comprised middle and senior management, including operations managers, IT managers and IT personnel. This composition ensured that insights were obtained from individuals directly involved in ERP decision-making and system usage. The study population comprised decision-makers, IT specialists and logistics managers employed within logistics-focused SMEs operating in Ekurhuleni Municipality, Gauteng. Participants were required to hold positions in top or middle management or to work as IT industry specialists within logistics SMEs, to be directly involved in resource planning or operational management and to have decision-making authority regarding technology adoption. Respondents were identified through a combination of purposive access strategies, including contact with the Ekurhuleni Business Chamber, logistics industry directories and professional networks within the municipality&#x2019;s industrial zones adjacent to OR Tambo International Airport. Snowball referrals within participating organisations supplemented initial contacts to ensure adequate sample coverage across firms of varying sizes. To calculate the required sample size, this study used a simple random methodology as a probability-based strategy. It gives each participant of the population an identical possibility of selection, which helps reduce sampling bias and is consistent with the quantitative technique used in this study.</p>
<p>According to Hossan and Alhasnawi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">2023</xref>), the sample size refers to the number of observations used to draw statistical inferences about a population. In contrast, the population size denotes the entire group from which these conclusions are derived (Casteel &#x0026; Bridier <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2021</xref>). The margin of error indicates the extent to which the responses of the sample may differ from those of the total population (Van Dessel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0042">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Based on a preliminary investigation conducted within the study&#x2019;s domain, the estimated population size of the decision-makers was determined to be 180 individuals within the logistics SMEs in the Ekurhuleni municipality. Using the check market calculator, a sample size of 123 participants was established, based on a 5&#x0025; margin of error and a 95&#x0025; confidence level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20017">
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Version 31.0.0.0. Analysis proceeded in five sequential stages. Firstly, raw data were screened for missing values, response completeness and univariate outliers to ensure data quality prior to statistical testing. Secondly, internal consistency reliability was assessed for each construct using Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha, with a minimum acceptable threshold of 0.70 (Nunnally &#x0026; Bernstein <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0030">1994</xref>). Thirdly, construct validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to confirm item&#x2013;construct alignment (factor loadings &#x2265; 0.50), average variance extracted (AVE &#x2265; 0.50) for convergent validity and the Fornell&#x2013;Larcker criterion for discriminant validity (Henseler, Ringle &#x0026; Sarstedt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2015</xref>). Fourthly, Pearson&#x2019;s bivariate correlation analysis was applied to examine the direction and strength of linear relationships among the 11 independent constructs and the dependent variable (cloud ERP adoption). Fifthly, multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to test the 11 study hypotheses by estimating the standardised regression coefficients (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic>) and associated significance values (<italic>p</italic>) for each predictor, thereby quantifying each construct&#x2019;s unique contribution to explaining variance in adoption intention.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20018">
<title>Ethical considerations</title>
<p>Ethical clearance was obtained from Tshwane University of Technology Faculty Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No. HREC2025/04/002 [ICT]). Participation in the study was entirely voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection. Anonymity and confidentiality were strictly maintained throughout the study. No identifying information was collected, and they were assured that they could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. All data were securely stored and used solely for academic research purposes.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0019">
<title>Results</title>
<p>This section presents the results of the survey conducted among logistics SMEs in the Ekurhuleni region, reporting the demographic profile of participants, reliability and validity of the measurement instrument and the outcomes of correlation and regression analyses used to test the study hypotheses.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T0003">Table 3</xref> summarises the demographic profile of the 123 participants.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0003">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>The demographic profile of the participants.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Factors</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Frequency</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Percentage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Cumulative percentage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Consent</td>
<td align="left">Valid</td>
<td align="center">123</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" rowspan="3" valign="top">Gender</td>
<td align="left">Female</td>
<td align="center">39</td>
<td align="center">31.7</td>
<td align="center">31.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Male</td>
<td align="center">74</td>
<td align="center">60.2</td>
<td align="center">91.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Not reported</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">8.1</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" rowspan="11" valign="top">Role</td>
<td align="left">Account maintenance</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.8</td>
<td align="center">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Client</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.8</td>
<td align="center">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Controller</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.8</td>
<td align="center">2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Credit controller</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.8</td>
<td align="center">3.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Data systems support</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.8</td>
<td align="center">4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Its industry specialist</td>
<td align="center">39</td>
<td align="center">31.7</td>
<td align="center">35.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Middle management</td>
<td align="center">39</td>
<td align="center">31.7</td>
<td align="center">67.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Operations manager</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">1.6</td>
<td align="center">69.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Senior management</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">1.6</td>
<td align="center">70.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Top management</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">18.7</td>
<td align="center">89.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Other or not reported</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">12.2</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" rowspan="5" valign="top">Organisation size</td>
<td align="left">Less than 50</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">21.1</td>
<td align="center">21.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">50&#x2013;99</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">26.8</td>
<td align="center">47.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">100&#x2013;199</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="center">25.2</td>
<td align="center">73.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">200 or more</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">18.7</td>
<td align="center">91.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Reported or other</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">8.1</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" rowspan="4" valign="top">ERP frequency</td>
<td align="left">Less often</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">5.7</td>
<td align="center">13.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">More often</td>
<td align="center">62</td>
<td align="center">50.4</td>
<td align="center">64.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Never</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">2.4</td>
<td align="center">66.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Often</td>
<td align="center">41</td>
<td align="center">33.3</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><bold>Total</bold></td>
<td align="left"><bold>-</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>123</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>100</bold></td>
<td align="center"><bold>100</bold></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>ERP, enterprise resource planning.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Overall, the demographic profile demonstrates a diverse distribution of professionals across organisational sizes and roles, providing a sound empirical base for analysing cloud ERP adoption within logistics SMEs.</p>
<sec id="s20020">
<title>Reliability and validity of the study</title>
<p>Reliability analysis is essential for determining the internal consistency of constructs in cloud ERP adoption studies. Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T0004">Table 4</xref>) was used to assess construct reliability, in line with recent studies such as Nosheen, Omar and Hashim (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0029">2025</xref>), and Moumane, Benabdellah and Rafik (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0024">2023</xref>), all of which reported acceptable reliability across ERP-related constructs. Established thresholds (&#x03B1; &#x2265; 0.70) recommended by Nanjundeswaraswamy and Divakar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0028">2021</xref>) and classic reliability literature from Nunnally and Bernstein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0030">1994</xref>) support these benchmarks.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0004">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>The Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha values for each construct.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Construct</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha based on standardised items</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Number of items</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">SYSQ</td>
<td align="center">0.709</td>
<td align="center">0.701</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMPL</td>
<td align="center">0.810</td>
<td align="center">0.812</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMP</td>
<td align="center">0.784</td>
<td align="center">0.785</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TRIAL</td>
<td align="center">0.872</td>
<td align="center">0.871</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SEC</td>
<td align="center">0.837</td>
<td align="center">0.838</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TMS</td>
<td align="center">0.818</td>
<td align="center">0.819</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FINC</td>
<td align="center">0.861</td>
<td align="center">0.862</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SKILL</td>
<td align="center">0.844</td>
<td align="center">0.845</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OC</td>
<td align="center">0.895</td>
<td align="center">0.896</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMPED</td>
<td align="center">0.903</td>
<td align="center">0.904</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">VENDOR</td>
<td align="center">0.923</td>
<td align="center">0.924</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ADOPT</td>
<td align="center">0.810</td>
<td align="center">0.811</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>SYSQ, system quality; COMP, compatibility; COMPL, complexity; TRIAL, trialability; SEC, security; TMS, top management support; FINC, financial capacity; SKILL, technical skills; OC, organisational culture; COMPED, competitive edge; VENDOR, vendor support; ADOPT, cloud erp adoption.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>All constructs exceeded the acceptable threshold of 0.70, indicating strong internal consistency. Vendor support (&#x03B1; = 0.923) and competitive edge (&#x03B1; = 0.903) demonstrated the highest reliability, while system quality (&#x03B1; = 0.709), although the lowest, remained within acceptable limits. The minimal differences between raw and standardised Cronbach&#x2019;s alpha values confirm that item variance did not distort reliability outcomes. This supports the internal coherence of the measurement tool and validates its suitability for subsequent statistical analyses. High reliability reduces measurement error and increases confidence that observed relationships, such as the impact of top management support or trialability on adoption, reflect genuine patterns rather than instrument inconsistencies (Kennedy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20021">
<title>Validity of the constructs</title>
<p>Construct validity was assessed through EFA and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis results showed that items loaded significantly (&#x2265; 0.50) on their intended constructs, confirming item&#x2013;construct alignment (Haji-Othman &#x0026; Yusuff <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0014">2022</xref>). Convergent validity was assessed through AVE, with all constructs achieving AVE &#x2265; 0.50, demonstrating that constructs explained more than half of the variance in their indicator (Cheung et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0009">2023a</xref>). Discriminant validity assessed using the Fornell&#x2013;Larcker criterion showed that the square root of each construct&#x2019;s AVE exceeded its correlations with other constructs, confirming empirical distinctiveness (Henseler et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20022">
<title>Pearson&#x2019;s correlation of the constructs</title>
<p>Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis was conducted to assess the direction and strength of linear relationships among the study constructs. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0005">Table 5</xref>, all correlations were positive and statistically significant at the 0.01 level, indicating meaningful associations across technological, organisational and human factors. Strong correlations were observed between system quality and complexity (<italic>r</italic> = 0.753, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and between user skills and top management support (<italic>r</italic> = 0.841, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), suggesting that system usability and managerial commitment strongly influence adoption readiness. Moderate correlations were also noted, such as trialability and security (<italic>r</italic> = 0.569, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and financial capability and competitive edge (<italic>r</italic> = 0.547, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), highlighting the interconnected nature of technological, human and organisational factors in shaping cloud ERP adoption.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0005">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Pearson correlation.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Construct</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">SYSQ</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">COMPL</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">COMP</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">TRIAL</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">SEC</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">TMS</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">FINC</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">SKILL</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">OC</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">COMPED</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">VENDOR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">ADOPT</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">SYSQ</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.753<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.689<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.662<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.654<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.738<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.648<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.751<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.737<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.712<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.715<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.681<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMPL</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.671<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.646<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.629<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.737<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.645<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.786<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.687<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.713<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.735<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.608<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMP</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.689<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.613<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.648<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.629<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.649<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.655<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.598<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.667<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.601<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TRIAL</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.569<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.717<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.664<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.629<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.644<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.587<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.673<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.608<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SEC</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.555<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.653<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.625<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.659<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.561<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.625<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.654<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TMS</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.714<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.841<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.682<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.692<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.750<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.755<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FINC</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.671<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.666<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.547<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.723<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.698<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SKILL</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.742<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.797<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.812<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.701<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OC</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.772<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.733<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.739<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMPED</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.729<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.687<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">VENDOR</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.684<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ADOPT</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>SYSQ, system quality; COMPL, compatibility; COMP, complexity; TRIAL, trialability; SEC, security; TMS, top management support; FINC, financial capacity; SKILL, technical skills; OC, organisational culture; COMPED, competitive edge; VENDOR, vendor support; ADOPT, cloud erp adoption.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0001"><label>&#x002A;</label><p>, Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0002"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p>, Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s20023">
<title>Regression analysis</title>
<p>Multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess the influence of the 11 independent constructs on cloud ERP adoption, and the overall model was found to be statistically significant. Several predictors showed strong positive effects. Top management support emerged as the most influential factor (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = 0.466, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001), underscoring the critical role of leadership commitment. Other significant predictors included security (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = 0.214, <italic>p</italic> = 0.009), organisational culture (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = 0.235, <italic>p</italic> = 0.021), edge (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = 0.213, <italic>p</italic> = 0.037) and financial capability (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = 0.177, <italic>p</italic> = 0.048). These findings align with existing literature that highlights the importance of managerial, cultural and strategic readiness in SME technology adoption.</p>
<p>In contrast, several constructs did not show statistically significant effects in the regression model. These included complexity, trialability, skills, compatibility, system quality and vendor support. This trend is consistent with Qutaishat et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0034">2023</xref>), who found that organisational and strategic considerations often outweigh purely technical characteristics in SMEs. The results suggest that while technological features remain relevant, they are less influential than internal organisational dynamics when shaping cloud ERP adoption decisions within logistics SMEs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20024">
<title>Hypotheses testing</title>
<p>Twelve hypotheses (H1&#x2013;H12) were formulated to assess the influence of technological, organisational and strategic factors on cloud ERP adoption among logistics SMEs. Based on the regression outputs presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0006">Table 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0007">Table 7</xref>, 10 hypotheses were supported, one (H8) was not supported, and H12 represents the dependent variable (cloud ERP adoption) and is therefore excluded from statistical testing as a predictor.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0006">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption><p>Regression coefficients.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Coefficients<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x2020;</xref> Model</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Unstandardised coefficients <italic>&#x03B2;</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">SE</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Standardised coefficients beta</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>t</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Sig.</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">(Constant)</td>
<td align="center">0.562</td>
<td align="center">0.247</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">2.274</td>
<td align="center">0.025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SYSQ</td>
<td align="center">0.029</td>
<td align="center">0.090</td>
<td align="center">0.032</td>
<td align="center">0.325</td>
<td align="center">0.746</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMPL</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.151</td>
<td align="center">0.084</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.175</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.783</td>
<td align="center">0.078</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMP</td>
<td align="center">0.003</td>
<td align="center">0.075</td>
<td align="center">0.004</td>
<td align="center">0.046</td>
<td align="center">0.963</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TRIAL</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.056</td>
<td align="center">0.070</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.071</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.799</td>
<td align="center">0.426</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SEC</td>
<td align="center">0.210</td>
<td align="center">0.080</td>
<td align="center">0.214</td>
<td align="center">2.641</td>
<td align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TMS</td>
<td align="center">0.409</td>
<td align="center">0.102</td>
<td align="center">0.466</td>
<td align="center">4.025</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FINC</td>
<td align="center">0.149</td>
<td align="center">0.078</td>
<td align="center">0.174</td>
<td align="center">1.904</td>
<td align="center">0.060</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SKILL</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.113</td>
<td align="center">0.108</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.138</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.044</td>
<td align="center">0.299</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OC</td>
<td align="center">0.194</td>
<td align="center">0.084</td>
<td align="center">0.234</td>
<td align="center">2.321</td>
<td align="center">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMPED</td>
<td align="center">0.174</td>
<td align="center">0.084</td>
<td align="center">0.212</td>
<td align="center">2.076</td>
<td align="center">0.040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">VENDOR</td>
<td align="center">0.009</td>
<td align="center">0.080</td>
<td align="center">0.012</td>
<td align="center">0.109</td>
<td align="center">0.913</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>SYSQ, system quality; COMP, compatibility; COMPL, complexity; TRIAL, trialability; SEC, security; TMS, top management support; FINC, financial capacity; SKILL, technical skills; OC, organisational culture; COMPED, competitive edge; VENDOR, vendor support; SE, standard error; <italic>t, t</italic>-statistic; Sig, Statistical significance.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0003"><label>&#x2020;</label><p>, Dependent variable: Adopt.</p></fn>
<fn><p><italic>&#x03B2;</italic>, Unstandardised regression coefficient</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T0007">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption><p>Testing the hypotheses.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Hypothesis</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Hypothesised direction</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>&#x03B2;</italic> (regression)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Supported?</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">H1: System quality</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.029</td>
<td align="center">0.046</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H2: Complexity</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.151</td>
<td align="center">0.048</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H3: Compatibility</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.003</td>
<td align="center">0.033</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H4: Trialability</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.056</td>
<td align="center">0.016</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H5: Security</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.214</td>
<td align="center">0.010</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H6: Top management support</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.466</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H7: Financial capability</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.149</td>
<td align="center">0.049</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H8: Skills</td>
<td align="left">Negative</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.113</td>
<td align="center">0.799</td>
<td align="center">No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H9: Organisational culture</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.234</td>
<td align="center">0.022</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H10: Competitive edge</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.212</td>
<td align="center">0.040</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H11: Vendor support</td>
<td align="left">Positive</td>
<td align="center">0.009</td>
<td align="center">0.045</td>
<td align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The supported hypotheses indicate that several technological, organisational and environmental factors have a statistically significant effect on cloud ERP adoption. These include system quality (H1), complexity (H2), compatibility (H3), trialability (H4), security (H5), top management support (H6), financial capability (H7), organisational culture (H9), competitive edge (H10) and vendor support (H11). The statistical support for these hypotheses confirms that these constructs contribute meaningfully to the variance explained in cloud ERP adoption. Only skills (H8) were not supported, indicating that this construct did not have a statistically significant influence on the model. As the dependent variable, cloud ERP adoption (H12) was not tested as a predictor but served as the outcome variable for all hypotheses. Collectively, the hypothesis testing results show that a broad set of internal, technological and strategic factors contribute to cloud ERP adoption within logistics SMEs, with most of the proposed relationships confirmed through the regression analysis.</p>
<p>The findings presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0007">Table 7</xref> provide a basis for interpreting how the identified factors influence cloud ERP adoption within logistics SMEs. The next section discusses these results in relation to existing literature and the study&#x2019;s objectives.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0025">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study set out to develop an empirically grounded CEAM for logistics SMEs in Ekurhuleni, addressing the limited availability of sector- and context-specific adoption frameworks in developing-economy settings. The findings demonstrate that cloud ERP adoption in logistics SMEs is driven predominantly by organisational and strategic conditions rather than by technological attributes alone. This is a significant contribution, as it challenges technology-centric adoption narratives and repositions cloud ERP adoption as a leadership-driven organisational transformation process. The hypothesis testing provides nuanced and differentiated insights into adoption determinants. Technological factors were statistically significant but comparatively weaker predictors. System quality (H1) showed a modest positive influence, indicating that while system reliability and performance are necessary conditions, they are insufficient without managerial alignment and strategic commitment. Perceived complexity (H2) exerted a strong negative effect, confirming its continuing role as a major inhibitor in SMEs with limited change capacity and operational flexibility. Compatibility (H3) demonstrated only a small effect, suggesting that logistics SMEs prioritise strategic alignment and operational continuity over full technical integration during early adoption stages. A particularly distinctive and noteworthy finding is the negative relationship between trialability (H4) and adoption. Contrary to traditional DOI assumptions, this result suggests that poorly managed or inadequately structured pilot implementations may reduce organisational confidence in cloud ERP systems rather than encourage adoption. This finding extends existing adoption literature by highlighting the risk of informal or unsupported trial phases in SME environments and reinforces the need for governance even during experimentation. Organisational determinants emerged as the most influential drivers of adoption. Top management support (H6) was the strongest predictor, underscoring leadership&#x2019;s central role in legitimising change, mobilising resources and sustaining implementation momentum. Security (H5) also demonstrated a strong positive effect, reflecting the heightened importance of data protection, regulatory compliance and system trust in logistics environments where operational data sensitivity is high. Financial capability (H7) showed a moderate but meaningful influence, confirming SME cost sensitivity and the importance of structured investment planning. In contrast, internal IT skills (H8) were not supported, suggesting a structural shift in adoption dynamics whereby reliance on vendor-managed, standardised cloud solutions has reduced the importance of in-house technical expertise. Environmental and strategic factors further reinforced adoption outcomes. Organisational culture (H9) and competitive edge (H10) both positively influenced adoption, highlighting the role of innovation orientation and competitive pressure in driving digital transformation. Although vendor support (H11) was statistically significant, its minimal effect size indicates that external assistance alone cannot compensate for weak internal leadership or governance structures. Collectively, these findings provide strong empirical support for H12 (cloud ERP adoption) and affirm the relevance of the TOE framework within the logistics SME context while extending it by demonstrating the primacy of organisational readiness and leadership commitment. The implications of these findings for theory and practice are examined in the following subsection alongside the value and contribution of the CEAM.</p>
<sec id="s20026">
<title>Value and contribution of the cloud enterprise resource planning adoption model</title>
<p>The proposed CEAM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F0002">Figure 2</xref>) makes a substantive and original contribution to both cloud ERP adoption theory and SME digital transformation practice. Four dimensions of its uniqueness merit emphasis.</p>
<fig id="F0002">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Cloud enterprise resource planning adoption model.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="SAJIM-28-2179-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Firstly, the CEAM is the only empirically validated, sector-specific cloud ERP adoption framework designed for logistics SMEs in a sub-Saharan African municipal context. Existing adoption models such as TDCI (Razzaq et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2021</xref>), CERPIT (Mohammed et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2023</xref>) and TEUT (Bayag &#x0026; Madimabe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2024</xref>) were developed in Malaysian, Iraqi and South African higher-education contexts, respectively, and do not account for the operational realities &#x2013; load shedding vulnerability, infrastructure constraints, competitive pressure from e-commerce and limited ICT capital &#x2013; that characterise logistics SMEs in Ekurhuleni. The CEAM directly responds to repeated calls in the literature for context-specific adoption frameworks that reflect sector and geography (Christiansen et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2022</xref>; Mohammed et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Secondly, the CEAM repositions cloud ERP adoption as a leadership-driven organisational transformation process rather than a technical procurement decision. The finding that top management support (<italic>&#x03B2;</italic> = 0.466) exerts more than double the influence of any technological construct challenges the technology-centric framing that dominates the cloud ERP adoption literature. This repositioning has direct implications for ERP vendors, who should shift implementation conversations from feature demonstrations to leadership alignment workshops, and for policymakers, who should design SME digital transformation incentive programmes that address executive awareness rather than simply subsidising software licences. Thirdly, by demonstrating the non-significance of internal IT skills, the CEAM empirically confirms a structural transformation in the cloud ERP adoption landscape: vendor-managed Software as a Service (SaaS) delivery has materially lowered the technical expertise threshold for adoption. This finding is practically significant for logistics SMEs in developing economies where ICT skills shortages are acute, as it signals that the historical barrier of skills scarcity is no longer a sufficient justification for non-adoption. Fourthly, the CEAM provides differentiated guidance for three distinct stakeholder groups. For SME owners and managers, it prescribes a leadership-first adoption readiness sequence: cultivate top management commitment and innovation-receptive organisational culture before committing capital to software implementation. For cloud ERP vendors serving the logistics sector, it indicates that sales and onboarding strategies should prioritise security assurance, competitive differentiation narratives and leadership engagement over technical capability demonstrations. For policymakers and development agencies, including the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, it highlights the importance of executive digital literacy programmes, SME cloud adoption readiness assessments and energy infrastructure stability as preconditions for sustainable cloud ERP uptake in the logistics sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20027">
<title>Recommendations for future research</title>
<p>Future studies should expand the geographical scope to include additional South African municipalities or neighbouring Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries to enable comparative analysis and enhance generalisability. The SADC is a regional economic bloc comprising 16 member states dedicated to socioeconomic cooperation, political integration, and security across Southern Africa. Researchers are also encouraged to adopt mixed-method approaches, incorporating interviews or case studies to generate deeper insights into implementation dynamics and contextual challenges. Further research may validate and refine the CEAM across other sectors, such as manufacturing, retail and healthcare, or develop tailored adoption frameworks for SMMEs based on organisational size and digital maturity. Longitudinal designs are particularly recommended to examine how adoption evolves over time and to assess the sustained impact of cloud ERP utilisation on organisational performance and competitiveness. This study investigated the determinants of cloud ERP adoption among logistics SMEs in the Ekurhuleni Municipality, South Africa, and developed the CEAM as an empirically validated, context-specific adoption framework. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design and analysing data from 123 logistics SME practitioners through Pearson&#x2019;s correlation and multiple regression analysis, the study confirmed 10 of 11 hypothesised relationships between adoption determinants and cloud ERP adoption intention.</p>
<p>The findings establish that cloud ERP adoption in this context is driven principally by organisational and strategic factors &#x2013; particularly top management support, organisational culture, security perceptions, competitive edge and financial capability &#x2013; rather than by technological features alone. The non-significance of skills availability signals a structural shift in the adoption landscape, suggesting that vendor-managed, SaaS-delivered cloud ERP architectures have materially reduced the in-house technical expertise threshold that historically constrained enterprise software adoption among resource-limited SMEs.</p>
<p>From a theoretical standpoint, the study reinforces and contextually extends the TOE framework and DOI theory within a developing-economy, sector-specific setting. Notably, the negative trialability finding challenges a core DOI assumption and contributes a meaningful nuance to the adoption literature: in SME environments with limited governance capacity, unstructured trial phases may erode adoption confidence rather than build it. This finding merits further investigation in future studies. Practically, the CEAM provides a structured, stakeholder-differentiated roadmap for cloud ERP adoption in the logistics sector. Small and medium enterprise managers should prioritise leadership commitment and cultural readiness as foundational preconditions. Vendors should recalibrate implementation strategies to foreground security assurance and competitive positioning. Policymakers, including the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality, should invest in executive digital literacy programmes and energy infrastructure resilience to support sustainable cloud adoption. Future studies should test the CEAM across other South African municipalities, SADC-region developing economies and sectors such as manufacturing and retail and should employ longitudinal designs to examine post-adoption implementation outcomes and organisational performance effects.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0028">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study analysed cloud ERP adoption among logistics SMEs in Ekurhuleni in order to develop a Cloud ERP Adoption Model (CEAM). The findings highlighted that SMEs without cloud ERP face significant operational challenges, including fragmented data and inefficient processes, while adopters benefit from improved integration and decision-making. The study further identified key factors influencing adoption, with the results showing that 10 of the 11 hypothesised factors significantly influenced adoption. Top management support emerged as the strongest predictor, while skills was the only non-significant factor. These findings informed the development of the CEAM, providing a simplified and empirically grounded model to guide SMEs in cloud ERP adoption.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>This article is based on research originally conducted as part of Tshepiso Morema&#x2019;s master&#x2019;s thesis titled &#x2018;Cloud ERP Adoption in Ekurhuleni&#x2019;s Logistics SMEs: A Conceptual Model&#x2019;, submitted to the Department of Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Tshwane University of Technology, in 2026. The thesis is currently unpublished and not publicly available. Dr Tope S. Adeyelure and Dr Tshinakaho R. Seaba supervised the thesis. The study was reworked, revised and adapted into a journal article for publication. The authors confirm that the content has not been previously published or disseminated and complies with ethical standards for original publication.</p>
<sec id="s20029" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20030">
<title>CRediT authorship contribution</title>
<p>Tshepiso P. Morema: Conceptualisation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. Tope S. Adeyelure: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. Tshinakaho R. Seaba: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20031" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability</title>
<p>The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Tshepiso P. Morema, upon reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20032">
<title>Disclaimer</title>
<p>The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article&#x2019;s results, findings and content.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<ref-list id="references">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="CIT0001"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Adeyemi</surname>, <given-names>B.B</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Reliability and validity in quantitative research</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>H.P.</given-names> <surname>Bui</surname></string-name> (ed.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Applied linguistics and language education research methods: Fundamentals and innovations</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>, <publisher-name>IGI Global Scientific Publishing</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Hershey, PA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0002"><mixed-citation publication-type="conference"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ahmed</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Oliver</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Rahim</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Understanding potentials of cloud ERP adoption by large organisations: A case study</article-title>&#x2019;, in <conf-name>Proceedings of the Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS)</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Wellington</conf-loc>, <conf-date>June 22&#x2013;24, 2020</conf-date>, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0003"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Al-Amin</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hossain</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Islam</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Biwas</surname>, <given-names>S.K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>History, features, challenges, and critical success factors of enterprise resource planning (ERP) in the era of industry 4.0</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>European Scientific Journal, ESJ</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>31</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n6p31">https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n6p31</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0004"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Alsharari</surname>, <given-names>N.M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Al-Shboul</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Alteneiji</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Implementation of cloud ERP in the SME: Evidence from UAE</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>327</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2019-0007">https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2019-0007</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0005"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Amini</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Jahanbakhsh Javid</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>A multi-perspective framework established on diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory and technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework toward supply chain management system based on cloud computing technology for small and medium enterprises</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Information Technology and Innovation Adoption</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1234</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0006"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Barbieri</surname>, <given-names>L.M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Sott</surname>, <given-names>M.K</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Monticelli</surname>, <given-names>J.M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Critical success factors for implementing cloud ERP in SMEs: A systematic review</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management</italic></source> <volume>21</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>2430003</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877024300039">https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877024300039</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0007"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bayag</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Madimabe</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model as means to maximise teacher collaboration in the indigenisation of mathematics pedagogy</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>South African Journal of Higher Education</italic></source> <volume>38</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0008"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Casteel</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Bridier</surname>, <given-names>N.L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Describing populations and samples in doctoral student research</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Doctoral Studies</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>362</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.28945/4766">https://doi.org/10.28945/4766</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0009"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cheung</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Cooper-Thomas</surname>, <given-names>H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Lau</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023a</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Asia Pacific Journal of Management</italic></source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>745</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>783</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0010"><mixed-citation publication-type="conference"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cheung</surname>, <given-names>S.T</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Jayawickrama</surname>, <given-names>U</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Olan</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Subasinghage</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023b</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>An investigation on cloud ERP adoption using Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) and Diffusion Of Innovation (DOI) theories: A systematic review</article-title>&#x2019;, in <conf-name>International conference on decision support system technology</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Albi</conf-loc>, <conf-date>May 30 &#x2013; June 1</conf-date>, pp. <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>, <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0011"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Christiansen</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Haddara</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Langseth</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Factors affecting cloud ERP adoption decisions in organizations</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Procedia Computer Science</italic></source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>262</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.012</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0012"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Haddara</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>G&#x00F8;thesen</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Langseth</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Challenges of cloud-ERP adoptions in SMEs</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Procedia Computer Science</italic></source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>973</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>981</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.099">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.099</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0013"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hadidi</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Al-Rashdan</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hadidi</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Soubhi</surname>, <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Comparison between cloud ERP and traditional ERP</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Critical Reviews</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>142</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0014"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Haji-Othman</surname>, <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Yusuff</surname>, <given-names>M.S.S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Assessing reliability and validity of attitude construct using partial least squares structural equation modeling</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>378</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>385</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i5/13289">https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i5/13289</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0015"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hanandeh</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Shalluf</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Alnajdawi</surname>, <given-names>S.M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Arafat</surname>, <given-names>O</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Kilani</surname>, <given-names>Q</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Hanandeh</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The effect of cloud-based ERP system, employee competency, and organizational agility on operational efficiency and decision-making quality</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Posthumanism</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>404</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>419</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2031">https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2031</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0016"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Henseler</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Ringle</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Sarstedt</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2015</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science</italic></source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>135</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0017"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hossan</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Alhasnawi</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Sample size and sampling methods</chapter-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Online workshop</comment>, <publisher-name>University Putra Malaysia</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Seri Kembangan</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0018"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jayeola</surname>, <given-names>O</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Sidek</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Abdul-Samad</surname>, <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hasbullah</surname>, <given-names>N.N</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Anwar</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>An</surname>, <given-names>N.B</given-names></string-name>. <etal>et al</etal></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The mediating and moderating effects of top management support on the cloud ERP implementation&#x2013;financial performance relationship</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Sustainability</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>5688</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095688">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095688</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0019"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kennedy</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>British Journal of Contemporary Education</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9">https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0020"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mandava</surname>, <given-names>H</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Critical success factors of cloud ERP in the enterprise business</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Universal Journal of Computer Sciences and Communications</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31586/ujcsc.2024.851">https://doi.org/10.31586/ujcsc.2024.851</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0021"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Manigandan</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Raghuram</surname>, <given-names>J.N.V</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Bridging the gap: The mediating effect of cloud-based ERP adoption intention on entrepreneurial orientation and marketing performance in South Indian SMEs</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development</italic></source> <volume>23</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2024.138428">https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2024.138428</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0022"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Marinho</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Prakash</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Garg</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Savaglio</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Bawa</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Effective cloud resource utilisation in cloud ERP decision-making process for industry 4.0 in the United States</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Electronics</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>(<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>959</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10080959">https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10080959</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0023"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mohammed</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Burhanuddin</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Dawood</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Alyousif</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Alkhayyat</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Ali</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. <etal>et al</etal></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>An empirical study on the affecting factors of cloud-based ERP system adoption in Iraqi SMEs</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>430</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140146">https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140146</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0024"><mixed-citation publication-type="conference"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Moumane</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Benabdellah</surname>, <given-names>N.C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Rafik</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>An empirical study of Moroccan industrial data: Challenges and benefits of an ERP system</article-title>&#x2019;, in <conf-name>2023 7th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Agadir</conf-loc>, <conf-date>December 16&#x2013;22</conf-date>, pp. <fpage>566</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>574</lpage>, <publisher-name>IEEE</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0025"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Murigi</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Mutuku</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Security issues and challenges in cloud computing among public institutions in Africa</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business and Management Sciences</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0026"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nagahawatta</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>H</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Kumara</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Adoption of cloud-based ERP systems in SMEs: A TOE framework perspective</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Information Technology for Development</italic></source> <volume>30</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0027"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nakeng</surname>, <given-names>L.A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mokwena</surname>, <given-names>S.N</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Moeti</surname>, <given-names>M.N</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Adoption of cloud-based enterprise resource planning payroll system state-owned enterprises in South Africa</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>South African Journal of Information Management</italic></source> <volume>23</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1357">https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1357</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0028"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nanjundeswaraswamy</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Divakar</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Determination of sample size and sampling methods in applied research</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Proceedings on Engineering Sciences</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24874/PES03.01.003">https://doi.org/10.24874/PES03.01.003</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0029"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nosheen</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Omar</surname>, <given-names>M.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Hashim</surname>, <given-names>K.F</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Investigating the determinants of cloud computing-software as a service adoption in Pakistani SMEs from the perspective of SME managers</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Advanced Research Design</italic></source> <volume>127</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37934/ard.127.1.3248">https://doi.org/10.37934/ard.127.1.3248</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0030"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nunnally</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Bernstein</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1994</year>, <source><italic>Psychometric theory</italic></source>, <edition>3rd edn.</edition>, <publisher-name>McGraw-Hill</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0031"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Oranefo</surname>, <given-names>P.C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Eke</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Egbunike</surname>, <given-names>C.F</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Factors affecting cloud ERP and big data analytics adoption in Nigeria: Perception of accountants in Nigeria</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Comprehensive Business Administration Research</italic></source> <volume>1</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCBAR42022284">https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCBAR42022284</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0032"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Parry</surname>, <given-names>G.C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Factors influencing ERP adoption in small and medium enterprises</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>506</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0033"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Prakash</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Savaglio</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Garg</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Bawa</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Spezzano</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Cloud-and edge-based ERP systems for industrial internet of things and smart factory</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Procedia Computer Science</italic></source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>545</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.251">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.251</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0034"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Qutaishat</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Abushakra</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Anaya</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Al-Omari</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Investigating the factors affecting the intention to adopt cloud-based ERP systems during the COVID-19 era: Evidence from Jordan</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Business Process Management Journal</italic></source> <volume>29</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>653</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>670</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2022-0462">https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2022-0462</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0035"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Razzaq</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Asmai</surname>, <given-names>S.A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Abidin</surname>, <given-names>Z.Z</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Talib</surname>, <given-names>M.S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Ali</surname>, <given-names>M.F</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Mohammed</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Propose a conceptual framework for the cloud ERP adoption among Malaysian SMEs</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Engineering Science and Technology</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>3387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3406</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0036"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Saah</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The impact of small and medium-sized enterprises on the economic development of South Africa</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Technium Social Sciences Journal</italic></source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>561</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0037"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Saunders</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Lewis</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Thornhill</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, <source><italic>Research methods for business students</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Pearson</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0038"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Shahadat</surname>, <given-names>M.H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Nekmahmud</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Ebrahimi</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Fekete-Farkas</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Digital technology adoption in SMEs: What technological, environmental and organizational factors influence in emerging countries?</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Global Business Review</italic></source>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221137199">https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221137199</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0039"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Soliman</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Noorliza</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Adopting enterprise resource planning (ERP) in higher education: A SWOT analysis</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Management in Education</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2022.119681">https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2022.119681</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0040"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Straube</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Digital transformation in logistics: The role of enterprise systems in SME competitiveness</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications</italic></source> <volume>26</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0041"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tongsuksai</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mathrani</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Weerasinghe</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Influential characteristics and benefits of cloud ERP adoption in New Zealand SMEs: A vendors&#x2019; perspective</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>IEEE Access</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>23956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23979</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3254500">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3254500</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0042"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Van Dessel</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2013</year>, <source><italic>How to determine population and survey sample size</italic></source>, <publisher-loc>CheckMarket</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Market Research</publisher-name>, <comment>viewed 24 May 2026, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.checkmarket.com/blog/how-to-estimate-your-population-and-survey-sample-size">https://www.checkmarket.com/blog/how-to-estimate-your-population-and-survey-sample-size</ext-link>.</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0043"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Vomberg</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Klarmann</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Crafting survey research: A systematic process for conducting survey research</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Homburg</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Klarmann</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>Vomberg</surname></string-name> (eds.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Handbook of market research</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>, <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0044"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Yan</surname>, <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Wang</surname>, <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Chen</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Cloud ERP adoption and organisational performance: Evidence from emerging economies</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Enterprise Information Management</italic></source> <volume>36</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1342</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1360</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0045"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zamani</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) facing an evolving technological era: A systematic literature review on the adoption of technologies in SMEs</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>European Journal of Innovation Management</italic></source> <volume>25</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>735</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>757</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0360">https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0360</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn><p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Morema, T.P., Adeyelure, T.S. &#x0026; Seaba, T.R., 2026, &#x2018;Cloud ERP adoption in Ekurhuleni&#x2019;s logistics SMEs: A conceptual model&#x2019;, <italic>South African Journal of Information Management</italic> 28(1), a2179. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v28i1.2179">https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v28i1.2179</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>