Original Research

Barriers to electronic signature adoption in South African conveyancing

Luke Abrahams, Anthea P. Amadi-Echendu, Nonceba Ntoyanto-Tyatyantsi
South African Journal of Information Management | Vol 28, No 1 | a2139 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v28i1.2139 | © 2026 Luke Abrahams, Anthea P. Amadi-Echendu, Nonceba Ntoyanto-Tyatyantsi | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 27 November 2025 | Published: 14 July 2026

About the author(s)

Luke Abrahams, Department of Operations Management, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Anthea P. Amadi-Echendu, Department of Operations Management, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Nonceba Ntoyanto-Tyatyantsi, Department of Applied Management, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The conveyancing industry in South Africa has lagged in adopting digital processes because of interconnected social, technical and regulatory constraints. This has increased the risk of identity fraud and data manipulation in property transactions. Although electronic signatures are secure and legally compliant, adoption remains limited, highlighting the need for digital transformation.
Objectives: This study investigated barriers to adopting electronic signature technology in South African conveyancing through a socio-technical systems (STS) lens, examining how technical, social and environmental subsystems interact to affect adoption.
Method: A qualitative design was employed. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from three major conveyancing organisations in South Africa, complemented by document analysis of six compliance texts. Data were analysed using directed content analysis guided by STS theory.
Results: Four barriers emerged: high implementation costs (technical subsystem), limited digital literacy and trust deficits (social subsystem), and restrictive legislative frameworks (environmental subsystem). Interpreted through STS theory, these barriers are interconnected, creating a socio-technical adoption deadlock in which no single intervention is sufficient to drive adoption.
Conclusion: Electronic signatures can streamline conveyancing, reduce fraud and promote compliance, but effective adoption requires regulatory reform, affordable technology and improved user confidence.
Contribution: This study contributes by applying STS theory to electronic signature adoption in South African conveyancing and introducing the concept of a socio-technical adoption deadlock to explain persistent barriers. It provides insights for policymakers, practitioners and technologists seeking to modernise property transaction systems.


Keywords

electronic signatures; conveyancing; South Africa; socio-technical systems; adoption barriers

JEL Codes

K23: Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions

Metrics

Total abstract views: 384
Total article views: 350


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.