Original Research

A framework for assessment of knowledge management in South African government departments

Mamome P. Mabhena, Agnieta B. Pretorius, Steven P. Mamorobela
South African Journal of Information Management | Vol 27, No 1 | a1938 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v27i1.1938 | © 2025 Mamome P. Mabhena, Agnieta B. Pretorius, Steven P. Mamorobela | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 September 2024 | Published: 22 April 2025

About the author(s)

Mamome P. Mabhena, Department of Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
Agnieta B. Pretorius, Department of Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
Steven P. Mamorobela, Department of Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Background: This study seeks to evaluate knowledge management (KM) levels in South African government departments and develop a framework for effective assessment and improvement.

Objectives: The study aims to develop a framework for the assessment of KM in three South African government departments: Department of Communication (DOC), Department of Science and Technology (DST) and Government Communication and Information System (GCIS).

Method: A quantitative approach was used to assess the COBIT 5 management processes: Manage human resource (COBIT-APO07) to optimise the human resources (HR) capability to ensure that proper HR structures and skills are in place and manage knowledge (COBIT-BAI08) to ensure systematic creation, capturing, sharing and application of knowledge is applied. An online closed-ended questionnaire was distributed using Google Forms. A sample of 103 participants was selected using the mixed purposeful sampling technique.

Results: The COBIT 5 Process Capability Assessment reveals different levels of maturity across the departments. GCIS, DOC, and DST indicated predominantly Level 1 maturity, whereas DOC’s APO07 and DST’s BAI08 processes demonstrated Level 2 maturity.

Conclusion: This study identified areas for improvement and suggests that further government evaluation is necessary for effective resource management.

Contribution: This study developed a comprehensive framework that integrates KM theories with COBIT 5 management, enhancing research validity and providing practical guidelines for improving KM in government departments.


Keywords

knowledge management; COBIT 5; framework; assessment; framework.

JEL Codes

O32: Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Metrics

Total abstract views: 190
Total article views: 154


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.