Original Research

Altmetric and bibliometric indicators for academic social networks: Academia.edu & ResearchGate

Leslie Adriaanse, Cornelius J.P. Niemand, Chris Rensleigh
South African Journal of Information Management | Vol 26, No 1 | a1869 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1869 | © 2024 Leslie Adriaanse, Cornelius J.P. Niemand, Chris Rensleigh | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 April 2024 | Published: 07 November 2024

About the author(s)

Leslie Adriaanse, Department of Research, Innovation and Commercialisation, Professional Research Committee, Directorate: Research Support, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa; and Department of Information and Knowledge Management, College of Business and Economic Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Cornelius J.P. Niemand, Department of Information and Knowledge Management, College of Business and Economic Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Chris Rensleigh, Department of Information and Knowledge Management, College of Business and Economic Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: E-visibility embodies the online presence of a researcher and their research, the researcher’s discoverability, and the accessibility of the research. Academic social networking tools (ASNT) enable the creation of altmetrics for research within these academic online research communities.

Objectives: This article reports on the correlations between e-visibility and altmetric-bibliometric indicators on ASNTs (Academia.edu and ResearchGate) for the Environmental Sciences researchers at the University of South Africa.

Method: Altmetric and bibliometric indicators were collected from the ASNTs (Academia.edu and ResearchGate) and bibliometric data from the traditional citation resources (Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar), as part of a longitudinal study exploring research e-visibility and altmetric-bibliometric trends. Statistical analysis (using Spearman’s rank coefficient) was conducted on the altmetric and bibliometric data to identify the altmetric-bibliometric correlations.

Results: The altmetric-bibliometric spearman correlation results show positive correlations that translates to increases in bibliometrics and altmetrics on ASNTs and citation resources.

Conclusion: This study is significant as it concludes that altmetric-bibliometric indicators correlate positively and translate to the increase in research e-visibility and it allows for the enhancement of research and societal impact for environmental researchers within a South African context.

Contribution: The findings of this study are beneficial to all researchers aiming at increasing their citation counts and enhancing their research- and societal impact. The main contribution of the study is the identification of altmetric-bibliometric correlations. Recommendations for researchers include well-maintained research profiles on ASNTs and citation resources for the increase of research e-visibility and the enhancement of research and societal impact.


Keywords

e-visibility; altmetrics; bibliometrics; altmetric-bibliometric correlations; academic social networking tools; ResearchGate; Academia.edu; Web of Science; Scopus; Google Scholar

JEL Codes

D80: General

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 294
Total article views: 215


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.